We call a decision maker risk averse for losses if that decision maker is risk aversewith respect to lotteries having alternatives below a given reference alternative intheir support. A two-person bargaining solution is called invariant under riskaversion for losses if the assigned outcome does not change after correcting for riskaversion for losses with this outcome as pair of reference levels, provided that thedisagreement point only changes proportionally. We present an axiomatic characterization of the Nash bargaining solution based on this condition, and we alsoprovide a decision-theoretic characterization of the concept of risk aversion forlosses
Bargaining problems are considered where the preferences of the bargainers deviate from expected uti...
We revisit the well-known result that asserts that an increase in the degree of one’s risk aversion ...
We consider bargaining problems under the assumption that players are loss averse, i.e., experience ...
We call a decision maker risk averse for losses if that decision maker is risk aversewith respect to...
We call a decision maker risk averse for losses if that decision maker is risk aversewith respect to...
We consider bargaining situations where two players evaluate outcomes with reference-dependent utili...
This paper studies the comparative statics regarding changes in risk on Nash's solution to bargainin...
It is widely accepted among axiomatic bargaining theorists that if one bargainer is more risk averse...
Bargaining problems are considered where the preferences of the bargainers deviate from expected uti...
Bargaining problems are considered where the preferences of the bargainers deviate from expected uti...
Bargaining problems are considered where the preferences of the bargainers deviate from expected uti...
Bargaining problems are considered where the preferences of the bargainers deviate from expected uti...
It is widely accepted among axiomatic bargaining theorists that if one bargainer is more risk averse...
It is widely accepted among axiomatic bargaining theorists that if one bargainer is more risk averse...
We revisit the well-known result that asserts that an increase in the degree of one's risk aversion ...
Bargaining problems are considered where the preferences of the bargainers deviate from expected uti...
We revisit the well-known result that asserts that an increase in the degree of one’s risk aversion ...
We consider bargaining problems under the assumption that players are loss averse, i.e., experience ...
We call a decision maker risk averse for losses if that decision maker is risk aversewith respect to...
We call a decision maker risk averse for losses if that decision maker is risk aversewith respect to...
We consider bargaining situations where two players evaluate outcomes with reference-dependent utili...
This paper studies the comparative statics regarding changes in risk on Nash's solution to bargainin...
It is widely accepted among axiomatic bargaining theorists that if one bargainer is more risk averse...
Bargaining problems are considered where the preferences of the bargainers deviate from expected uti...
Bargaining problems are considered where the preferences of the bargainers deviate from expected uti...
Bargaining problems are considered where the preferences of the bargainers deviate from expected uti...
Bargaining problems are considered where the preferences of the bargainers deviate from expected uti...
It is widely accepted among axiomatic bargaining theorists that if one bargainer is more risk averse...
It is widely accepted among axiomatic bargaining theorists that if one bargainer is more risk averse...
We revisit the well-known result that asserts that an increase in the degree of one's risk aversion ...
Bargaining problems are considered where the preferences of the bargainers deviate from expected uti...
We revisit the well-known result that asserts that an increase in the degree of one’s risk aversion ...
We consider bargaining problems under the assumption that players are loss averse, i.e., experience ...