Mean and seasonal circulation of the eastern Chukchi Sea from moored timeseries in 2013-2014

Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2021. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 126(5), (2021): e2020JC016863, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016863.From late-summer 2013 to late-summer 2014, a total of 20 moorings were maintained on the eastern Chukchi Sea shelf as part of five independent field programs. This provided the opportunity to analyze an extensive set of timeseries to obtain a broad view of the mean and seasonally varying hydrography and circulation over the course of the year. Year-long mean bottom temperatures reflected the presence of the strong coastal circulation pathway, while mean bottom salinities were influenced by polynya/lead activity along the coast. The timing of the warm water appearance in spring/summer is linked to advection along the various flow pathways. The timing of the cold water appearance in fall/winter was not reflective of advection nor related to the time of freeze-up. Near the latitude of Barrow Canyon, the cold water was accompanied by freshening. A one-dimensional mixed-layer model demonstrates that wind mixing, due to synoptic storms, overturns the water column resulting in the appearance of the cold water. The loitering pack ice in the region, together with warm southerly winds, melted ice and provided an intermittent source of fresh water that was mixed to depth according to the model. Farther north, the ambient stratification prohibits wind-driven overturning, hence the cold water arrives from the south. The circulation during the warm and cold months of the year is different in both strength and pattern. Our study highlights the multitude of factors involved in setting the seasonal cycle of hydrography and circulation on the Chukchi shelf.The authors are extremely grateful to all of these individuals, and to the funding agencies that supported the respective field programs: The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management; The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; The National Science Foundation; and The Japanese Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology. Support for this analysis was provided by the following grants: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration grant NA14OAR4320158; National Science Foundation grants PLR-1504333, OPP-1733564, PLR-1758565; North Pacific Research Board grants A91-99a and A91-00a; Chinese Arctic and Antarctic grant CXPT2020009; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada