PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENJATUHKAN SANKSI TINDAK PIDANA PENGGELAPAN DALAM JABATAN YANG DILAKUKAN SECARA BERKELANJUTAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG (Analisis Putusan Nomor:1595K/Pid.Sus/2020)

The purpose of the author in this writing is to find out the basis of judges' considerations in deciding cases against criminal acts of embezzlement in office which are carried out continuously in the perspective of money laundering in the analysis of the Supreme Court's decision Nomor.1595K/Pid.Sus/2020. This writing is normative. The types of data are research sources in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Data collection techniques using literature studies or document studies, data analysis techniques with methods that use deductive thinking patterns. This study explains and analyzes the basic considerations of the panel of judges in deciding cases of criminal acts of embezzlement in office which are carried out continuously in the perspective of money laundering. Based on this research, it can be concluded that the decision of the cassation judge has fulfilled the elements of a good decision, the judge in deciding whether a case is appropriate or not a person is sentenced to a crime based on his belief and the judge's decision is bound by the substance of the principle of independence.Keywords: Crime of Embezzlement, Crime of Money Launderin