Background: Past guidance in the codes of practice urged doctors to provide treatment even in the context of extreme adversities. Despite the significant societal changes of recent times, contemporary guidance regarding the duty to treat during a pandemic has been limited. Objective: The authors herewith examine deontological aspects pertaining to the duty to treat during a pandemic and the potential disruptions to health care services. Conclusion: The ethical, legal and professional guidance for duty of care during a pandemic is uncertain and demands further debate
In the United Kingdom, the question of how much information is required to be given to patients abou...
A disaster is an occurrence disrupting a community’s normal functioning and existence. The disruptio...
International audienceThis scoping review mapped the main themes in existing expert guidelines for c...
From the ethics perspective, “duty of care” is a difficult and contested term, fraught with misconce...
The swine influenza (H1N1) outbreak in 2009 highlighted the ethical and legal pressures facing gener...
In the United Kingdom, the question of how much information is required to be given to patients abou...
The phrase "duty of care" is, at best, too vague and, at worst, ethically dangerous. The nature and ...
The phrase "duty of care" is, at best, too vague and, at worst, ethically dangerous. The nature and ...
SARS, like HIV, placed healthcare workers at risk and raised issues about the duty to treat. But phi...
It is likely that the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic will affect a large part of the world’s population and wil...
As clinicians and support personnel struggle with their responsibilities to treat during the current...
Abstract Background As a number of commentators have noted, SARS exposed the vulnerabilities of our ...
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused clinicians at the frontlines to confront difficult decisions regard...
Doctors form an essential part of an effective response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We argue they have...
While Malm and colleagues (2008) do a fine job of consid-ering the limits and merits of a duty to tr...
In the United Kingdom, the question of how much information is required to be given to patients abou...
A disaster is an occurrence disrupting a community’s normal functioning and existence. The disruptio...
International audienceThis scoping review mapped the main themes in existing expert guidelines for c...
From the ethics perspective, “duty of care” is a difficult and contested term, fraught with misconce...
The swine influenza (H1N1) outbreak in 2009 highlighted the ethical and legal pressures facing gener...
In the United Kingdom, the question of how much information is required to be given to patients abou...
The phrase "duty of care" is, at best, too vague and, at worst, ethically dangerous. The nature and ...
The phrase "duty of care" is, at best, too vague and, at worst, ethically dangerous. The nature and ...
SARS, like HIV, placed healthcare workers at risk and raised issues about the duty to treat. But phi...
It is likely that the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic will affect a large part of the world’s population and wil...
As clinicians and support personnel struggle with their responsibilities to treat during the current...
Abstract Background As a number of commentators have noted, SARS exposed the vulnerabilities of our ...
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused clinicians at the frontlines to confront difficult decisions regard...
Doctors form an essential part of an effective response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We argue they have...
While Malm and colleagues (2008) do a fine job of consid-ering the limits and merits of a duty to tr...
In the United Kingdom, the question of how much information is required to be given to patients abou...
A disaster is an occurrence disrupting a community’s normal functioning and existence. The disruptio...
International audienceThis scoping review mapped the main themes in existing expert guidelines for c...