Add to ORKGA defendant charged with a crime has a right to a speedy trial. Violation of this right may serve as the grounds for granting a defendant’s motion to withdraw a guilty plea agreement, particularly where the defendant was not aware that this right was violated at the time he entered the plea agreement
Defendant pleaded guilty to a charge of statutory rape. After questioning him the court accepted his...
The right of every criminal defendant to a speedy trial is deeply entrenched in our legal heritage a...
The Court interpreted the good cause showing requirements in NRS 177.015(2) and defined two of the s...
The Court affirmed Lyons v. State, which gives the courts discretion to reject a defendant’s request...
In People v. Ganci, the defendant had been indicted for robbery, larceny, and assault while serving ...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether the district court erred in dismissing the criminal comp...
The Court affirmed a pretrial motion to dismiss of an indictment after it determined that the State ...
On appeal from a judgment of conviction, the Nevada Supreme Court considers the scope of a mid-trial...
The Court invoked its supervisory powers and adopted a rule of admissibility to limit the use of a p...
The United States Supreme Court has held that the period of time between the dismissal of military c...
The Court invoked its supervisory powers and adopted a rule of admissibility to limit the use of a p...
The Court reaffirmed its holding in Kuykendall v. State, interpreting NRS 176.055(1) to require sent...
The Court reasoned that the timely assertion by defendant-petitioner of his constitutional right to ...
This note will analyze the Supreme Court\u27s holding in United States v. MacDonald in view of the p...
People v. White, 2 N.Y.2d 220, 159 N.Y.S.2d 168 (1957); People v. Chirieleison, 3 N.Y.2d 170, 164 N....
Defendant pleaded guilty to a charge of statutory rape. After questioning him the court accepted his...
The right of every criminal defendant to a speedy trial is deeply entrenched in our legal heritage a...
The Court interpreted the good cause showing requirements in NRS 177.015(2) and defined two of the s...
The Court affirmed Lyons v. State, which gives the courts discretion to reject a defendant’s request...
In People v. Ganci, the defendant had been indicted for robbery, larceny, and assault while serving ...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether the district court erred in dismissing the criminal comp...
The Court affirmed a pretrial motion to dismiss of an indictment after it determined that the State ...
On appeal from a judgment of conviction, the Nevada Supreme Court considers the scope of a mid-trial...
The Court invoked its supervisory powers and adopted a rule of admissibility to limit the use of a p...
The United States Supreme Court has held that the period of time between the dismissal of military c...
The Court invoked its supervisory powers and adopted a rule of admissibility to limit the use of a p...
The Court reaffirmed its holding in Kuykendall v. State, interpreting NRS 176.055(1) to require sent...
The Court reasoned that the timely assertion by defendant-petitioner of his constitutional right to ...
This note will analyze the Supreme Court\u27s holding in United States v. MacDonald in view of the p...
People v. White, 2 N.Y.2d 220, 159 N.Y.S.2d 168 (1957); People v. Chirieleison, 3 N.Y.2d 170, 164 N....
Defendant pleaded guilty to a charge of statutory rape. After questioning him the court accepted his...
The right of every criminal defendant to a speedy trial is deeply entrenched in our legal heritage a...
The Court interpreted the good cause showing requirements in NRS 177.015(2) and defined two of the s...