The United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the U.S. Forest Service‟s proxy-on-proxy approach, when considering livestock grazing levels in Southwest Montana‟s Antelope Basin/Elk Lake Project in the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest, did not comply with the National Forest Management Act. The court determined that the Forest Service failed to take a requisite “hard look” at environmental impacts, such as the impacts on sage grouse populations and the maintenance of diverse habitats for native wildlife, when it approved grazing allotment updates
Two environmental advocacy groups challenged the decision of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS...
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia found that the BLM and Forest Service ...
In a 2007 Travel Management Plan, the United States Forest Service limited roads and trails designat...
The United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the U.S. Forest Service‟s proxy-on-proxy ...
In Native Ecosystems Council v. Marten, the Ninth Circuit found that the United States Forest Servic...
This case involves challenges to the adequacy of the United States Forest Service’s biological asses...
A federal court in Montana vacated the lease sale of several large oil and gas developments in Monta...
The Idaho District Court granted WWP’s motion for summary judgment and denied those of the BLM and i...
Environmental plaintiffs demanded injunctions following U.S. Forest Service approval of two fuel red...
In this case, a federal district court held federal agencies must reinitiate Environmental Species A...
In Russell Country Sportsmen v. U.S. Forest Service, the District Court for the District of Montana ...
In their decision to partially vacate and partially reverse the district court’s holding for the Def...
Overturning thirty-year-old precedent, Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. United States Forest S...
The Pit River Tribe of northern California sued the U.S. Forest service for not conducting a full en...
In Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Salazar, the United States District Court for the District of Mo...
Two environmental advocacy groups challenged the decision of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS...
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia found that the BLM and Forest Service ...
In a 2007 Travel Management Plan, the United States Forest Service limited roads and trails designat...
The United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the U.S. Forest Service‟s proxy-on-proxy ...
In Native Ecosystems Council v. Marten, the Ninth Circuit found that the United States Forest Servic...
This case involves challenges to the adequacy of the United States Forest Service’s biological asses...
A federal court in Montana vacated the lease sale of several large oil and gas developments in Monta...
The Idaho District Court granted WWP’s motion for summary judgment and denied those of the BLM and i...
Environmental plaintiffs demanded injunctions following U.S. Forest Service approval of two fuel red...
In this case, a federal district court held federal agencies must reinitiate Environmental Species A...
In Russell Country Sportsmen v. U.S. Forest Service, the District Court for the District of Montana ...
In their decision to partially vacate and partially reverse the district court’s holding for the Def...
Overturning thirty-year-old precedent, Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. United States Forest S...
The Pit River Tribe of northern California sued the U.S. Forest service for not conducting a full en...
In Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Salazar, the United States District Court for the District of Mo...
Two environmental advocacy groups challenged the decision of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS...
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia found that the BLM and Forest Service ...
In a 2007 Travel Management Plan, the United States Forest Service limited roads and trails designat...