Add to ORKGA Montana District Court ruled that William Perry Pendley unlawfully served as the Director of BLM for 424 days and cast doubt on the legality of many BLM decisions made during that period. The ruling took a stronger stand against the Trump administration’s liberal and brash use of acting appointees than other, similar cases have
In Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Salazar, the United States District Court for the District of Mo...
In Martin v. United States, the Federal Circuit Court dismissed a Fifth Amendment regulatory takings...
Defendant landowners claimed possession of riparian lands bordering the Missouri River. However, the...
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted a preliminary injun...
After President Trump’s Executive Order No. 13783 encouraging relaxing regulatory burdens on energy ...
The United States District Court for the District of Montana granted Plaintiffs summary judgment aga...
A consortium of environmental groups brought suit challenging an executive order opening millions of...
A federal court in Montana vacated the lease sale of several large oil and gas developments in Monta...
In Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership v. Salazar, the United States District Court of Appea...
In Wyoming v. Zinke, the Bureau of Land Management attempted to update a regulation governing hydrau...
Two environmental advocacy groups challenged the decision of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS...
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia found that the BLM and Forest Service ...
The Montana Supreme Court affirmed the Fourth Judicial District Court’s holding that Montana Code An...
The Trump administration has pursued many controversial goals in managing U.S. public lands, includi...
In WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. BLM, the District Court of Colorado showed that economic and developm...
In Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Salazar, the United States District Court for the District of Mo...
In Martin v. United States, the Federal Circuit Court dismissed a Fifth Amendment regulatory takings...
Defendant landowners claimed possession of riparian lands bordering the Missouri River. However, the...
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted a preliminary injun...
After President Trump’s Executive Order No. 13783 encouraging relaxing regulatory burdens on energy ...
The United States District Court for the District of Montana granted Plaintiffs summary judgment aga...
A consortium of environmental groups brought suit challenging an executive order opening millions of...
A federal court in Montana vacated the lease sale of several large oil and gas developments in Monta...
In Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership v. Salazar, the United States District Court of Appea...
In Wyoming v. Zinke, the Bureau of Land Management attempted to update a regulation governing hydrau...
Two environmental advocacy groups challenged the decision of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS...
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia found that the BLM and Forest Service ...
The Montana Supreme Court affirmed the Fourth Judicial District Court’s holding that Montana Code An...
The Trump administration has pursued many controversial goals in managing U.S. public lands, includi...
In WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. BLM, the District Court of Colorado showed that economic and developm...
In Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Salazar, the United States District Court for the District of Mo...
In Martin v. United States, the Federal Circuit Court dismissed a Fifth Amendment regulatory takings...
Defendant landowners claimed possession of riparian lands bordering the Missouri River. However, the...