After the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council declined to further investigate an amendment that would add two species of fish to a management plan, the appellants brought suit stating that federal agencies failed to properly manage river herring and shad in the Atlantic Ocean. Appellants asserted this inaction triggering judicial review under the Magnuson-Stevens Act and the Administrative Procedure Act. The court refused to find the National Marine Fisheries Services subject to judicial review, holding that the Council was not a government agency and that not amending the act did not constitute final agency action
During waning hours of its lame duck session, the 109th Congress passed the first major overhaul of ...
This essay adds a perspective from fisheries governance to the broader inquiry into the respective r...
The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA) governs management of fisheries l...
After the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council declined to further investigate an amendment that ...
The Eastern Louisiana District Court upheld Amendment 40 to the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Co...
The Eastern Louisiana District Court upheld Amendment 40 to the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Co...
The United States District Court for the District of Maine recently upheld a groundfish recovery pla...
The United States District Court for the District of Maine recently upheld a groundfish recovery pla...
During waning hours of its lame duck session, the 109th Congress passed the first major overhaul of ...
There are many issues under the Act which may come before the courts, including the effect of the Na...
The tide in the legal battle surrounding anadromous fish protections in the Columbia River watershed...
In Cherenzia v. Lynch, several commercial fishermen filed suit to challenge the constitutionality of...
In 1976, Congress enacted the Magnuson Fishery Management Conservation and Management Act (MFCMA), c...
The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA) governs management of fisheries l...
In one of its last acts of 2006, the 109th Congress passed the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation...
During waning hours of its lame duck session, the 109th Congress passed the first major overhaul of ...
This essay adds a perspective from fisheries governance to the broader inquiry into the respective r...
The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA) governs management of fisheries l...
After the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council declined to further investigate an amendment that ...
The Eastern Louisiana District Court upheld Amendment 40 to the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Co...
The Eastern Louisiana District Court upheld Amendment 40 to the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Co...
The United States District Court for the District of Maine recently upheld a groundfish recovery pla...
The United States District Court for the District of Maine recently upheld a groundfish recovery pla...
During waning hours of its lame duck session, the 109th Congress passed the first major overhaul of ...
There are many issues under the Act which may come before the courts, including the effect of the Na...
The tide in the legal battle surrounding anadromous fish protections in the Columbia River watershed...
In Cherenzia v. Lynch, several commercial fishermen filed suit to challenge the constitutionality of...
In 1976, Congress enacted the Magnuson Fishery Management Conservation and Management Act (MFCMA), c...
The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA) governs management of fisheries l...
In one of its last acts of 2006, the 109th Congress passed the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation...
During waning hours of its lame duck session, the 109th Congress passed the first major overhaul of ...
This essay adds a perspective from fisheries governance to the broader inquiry into the respective r...
The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA) governs management of fisheries l...