Add to ORKGThe Ninth Circuit’s en banc opinion in Big Lagoon Rancheria v. California is, thus far, perhaps the most important Indian law decision in 2015. Rejecting its three-judge panel’s opinion, the Ninth Circuit, en banc, affirmed the importance of defending tribal sovereignty against invidious state actions. The court denounced California’s use of Carcieri to de-recognize the Big Lagoon Rancheria and rescind the trust status of its land, characterizing it as “a belated collateral attack” on the Tribe and an “end-run” around the APA
Ten years ago, the United States Supreme Court issued its watershed decision in Carcieri v. Salazar,...
A Yes vote approves, and a No vote rejects, tribal gaming compacts between the state and the Nor...
A summary judgment decision is ordinarily not casenote material. But the denial of summary judgment ...
The Ninth Circuit’s en banc opinion in Big Lagoon Rancheria v. California is, thus far, perhaps the ...
On January 21, 2014, in Big Lagoon Rancheria v. California, a divided panel of the U.S. Court of App...
In 2005, the State of California and the Big Lagoon Rancheria American Indian Tribe reached an agree...
ARIZONA V. CALIFORNIA et al. No.8, Orig., March 30, 1983 is the latest in a series of related decisi...
Justice Kagan’s gambling metaphors aside, Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community stands as a resolut...
The most recent Indian law case before the Supreme Court, California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indi...
The Supreme Court’s decision in California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, 480 U.S. 202 (1987), ...
Section 5 of the Indian Reorganization Act (IRA) authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to acquire...
Across the nation there are 556 federally recognized tribes. California is home to the largest numbe...
On June 10, 2011, in Water Wheel Camp Recreational Area, Inc. v. LaRance, the U.S. Court of Appeals ...
The most recent Indian law case before the Supreme Court, California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indi...
Ever since California became a state of the Union in the mid 19th century, the state has had its fai...
Ten years ago, the United States Supreme Court issued its watershed decision in Carcieri v. Salazar,...
A Yes vote approves, and a No vote rejects, tribal gaming compacts between the state and the Nor...
A summary judgment decision is ordinarily not casenote material. But the denial of summary judgment ...
The Ninth Circuit’s en banc opinion in Big Lagoon Rancheria v. California is, thus far, perhaps the ...
On January 21, 2014, in Big Lagoon Rancheria v. California, a divided panel of the U.S. Court of App...
In 2005, the State of California and the Big Lagoon Rancheria American Indian Tribe reached an agree...
ARIZONA V. CALIFORNIA et al. No.8, Orig., March 30, 1983 is the latest in a series of related decisi...
Justice Kagan’s gambling metaphors aside, Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community stands as a resolut...
The most recent Indian law case before the Supreme Court, California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indi...
The Supreme Court’s decision in California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, 480 U.S. 202 (1987), ...
Section 5 of the Indian Reorganization Act (IRA) authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to acquire...
Across the nation there are 556 federally recognized tribes. California is home to the largest numbe...
On June 10, 2011, in Water Wheel Camp Recreational Area, Inc. v. LaRance, the U.S. Court of Appeals ...
The most recent Indian law case before the Supreme Court, California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indi...
Ever since California became a state of the Union in the mid 19th century, the state has had its fai...
Ten years ago, the United States Supreme Court issued its watershed decision in Carcieri v. Salazar,...
A Yes vote approves, and a No vote rejects, tribal gaming compacts between the state and the Nor...
A summary judgment decision is ordinarily not casenote material. But the denial of summary judgment ...