Crab‐driven processing does not explain leaf litter‐deposition in mangrove crab burrows

Abstract Many mangrove crab species drag freshly fallen leaf litter into their burrows and store it there for some time prior to consumption. Potential explanations for this behavior include (a) avoidance of competition for a scarce resource, (b) prevention of removal of a scarce resource upon tidal outwelling, or (c) processing of an initially unpalatable food source, be it physically through leaching, through the activity of the sediment microbiota, or driven by the activity of the crab itself. To test the latter, we study the effect of burying mangrove leaf litter on two relevant physicochemical litter characteristics and on its digestibility to crabs in a laboratory experiment, using artificial substratum with low microbial activity. Freshly fallen leaves of two common mangrove species, Bruguiera gymnorhiza and Ceriops tagal, were left for two weeks either inside burrows used by Neosamartium asiaticum (Sesarmidae), or on top of the substratum, before they were offered to the crabs as food. Leaf toughness and total phenolic content differed significantly between mangrove species. Upon two weeks of decay, phenolic content of both leaf litter species and toughness of B. gymnorhiza​ changed significantly. However, neither litter characteristcs nor assimilation efficiency differed between treatments. We conclude that storing mangrove leaf litter in crab burrows in a microbe‐poor environment does not affect litter digestibility. Hence, crabs themselves do not contribute to litter processing during storage inside the burrow. If it is litter processing, rather than the avoidance of competition or litter removal by tides, that renders the storage of litter inside the burrow advantageous, it will be microbial activity that drives this process. Further studies should explicitly focus on processing through the activity of the sediment microbiota