Raw data is not open to copyright, but databases, as compilations of data, have been treated differently. Early legal interpretations respected the compiler\u27s work under the “sweat of the brow” doctrine, until the Supreme Court ruled in 1991 that a modicum of creativity was required to earn copyright protection. The Court also ruled the International News Service infringed on the rights of the Associated Press (AP) by telegraphing news gathered by its competitor, and that the AP\u27s work was protected under state law through the “misappropriation doctrine.” The case was the basis of a 1997 case in which the National Basketball Association sued Motorola for transmitting real time game data by pager, making the defendant a competitor in p...
In the wake of Feist, copyright practitioners are scrambling to determine what it all means, and how...
This Article argues that U.S. copyright law provides a competitive advantage in the global race for ...
Following the Supreme Court\u27s 1991 Feist decision, intellectual property and Constitutional law s...
In National Basketball Ass\u27n v. Motorola, the Second Circuit encountered the problematic issue of...
The debate over databases protection has failed to identify and discuss some of its most basic and p...
In the recent British Horseracing Board case, the English High Court signaled a return to the sweat...
On March 27, 1991, a unanimous Supreme Court issued its opinion in Feist Publications v. Rural Telep...
The Authors trace the evolution of hybrid intellectual property rights protecting the contents of no...
The importance of data in the information society is steadily increasing. Today's digital economy re...
111-121Databases are generally perceived as static warehouses, storing up valuable facts and inform...
It is undeniable that databases are an essential building block of the Information Society. Today, e...
What protection remains for compilations of information, particularly digital databases, since the U...
The Eighth Circuit recently held that Mead Data Central infringed West Publishing\u27s copyright by ...
This paper examines the applications of copyright protection standards to the creation and utilisati...
Law making has never been able to keep up with the speed of technology. Indeed, reacting appropriate...
In the wake of Feist, copyright practitioners are scrambling to determine what it all means, and how...
This Article argues that U.S. copyright law provides a competitive advantage in the global race for ...
Following the Supreme Court\u27s 1991 Feist decision, intellectual property and Constitutional law s...
In National Basketball Ass\u27n v. Motorola, the Second Circuit encountered the problematic issue of...
The debate over databases protection has failed to identify and discuss some of its most basic and p...
In the recent British Horseracing Board case, the English High Court signaled a return to the sweat...
On March 27, 1991, a unanimous Supreme Court issued its opinion in Feist Publications v. Rural Telep...
The Authors trace the evolution of hybrid intellectual property rights protecting the contents of no...
The importance of data in the information society is steadily increasing. Today's digital economy re...
111-121Databases are generally perceived as static warehouses, storing up valuable facts and inform...
It is undeniable that databases are an essential building block of the Information Society. Today, e...
What protection remains for compilations of information, particularly digital databases, since the U...
The Eighth Circuit recently held that Mead Data Central infringed West Publishing\u27s copyright by ...
This paper examines the applications of copyright protection standards to the creation and utilisati...
Law making has never been able to keep up with the speed of technology. Indeed, reacting appropriate...
In the wake of Feist, copyright practitioners are scrambling to determine what it all means, and how...
This Article argues that U.S. copyright law provides a competitive advantage in the global race for ...
Following the Supreme Court\u27s 1991 Feist decision, intellectual property and Constitutional law s...