Academic library survey strategies may include implementing standardized and locally-developed survey instruments as part of assessment activities. Standardized instruments such as LibQUAL+, ClimateQUAL, Ithaka S+R surveys, and others are widely used and offer many advantages such as robust development and testing protocols, and may offer the ability to compare data with other institutions who use these instruments. Locally-developed survey instruments, on the other hand, offer the ability to customize instruments with reduced cost and increased institutional specificity. Libraries should evaluate the benefits of each survey type in order to create a strategy that best meets their needs
Cornell University Library's (CUL's) 2002 LibQUAL+ results. This report was produced by LibQUAL+ fo...
Mr. King offers suggestions on how to create and use surveys effectively to assess the quality of a ...
In 2015, LIBER commissioned the “Working group on Research and Education”. The goal was to collect b...
Academic library survey strategies may include implementing standardized and locally-developed surve...
How can librarians decide on a survey strategy for their library, and what are the advantages and di...
Librarians created four similar surveys (for undergraduate students, graduate students, faculty, and...
LibQUAL+ survey administered at the University of New England Libraries in 2008, submitted in suppor...
Analysis Report from 2015 LibQUAL+ Survey of Old Dominion University Libraries users
There is a growing body of literature on the development of the Association of Research Libraries (A...
Benchmarking data for the LibQUAL+ survey administered at the University of New England Libraries in...
Summary of user group comments from the LibQUAL+ survey administered at the University of New Englan...
This paper shares the Georgia Southern University Library’s experience of LibQUAL in user-centered a...
Executive Summary of a LibQUAL survey administered at the University of New England Libraries in 200...
2016 LibQUAL+ Survey branch analysis for the Lawrence V. Johnson Library of the KSU Library System,
The University Library at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) Services Advisory Co...
Cornell University Library's (CUL's) 2002 LibQUAL+ results. This report was produced by LibQUAL+ fo...
Mr. King offers suggestions on how to create and use surveys effectively to assess the quality of a ...
In 2015, LIBER commissioned the “Working group on Research and Education”. The goal was to collect b...
Academic library survey strategies may include implementing standardized and locally-developed surve...
How can librarians decide on a survey strategy for their library, and what are the advantages and di...
Librarians created four similar surveys (for undergraduate students, graduate students, faculty, and...
LibQUAL+ survey administered at the University of New England Libraries in 2008, submitted in suppor...
Analysis Report from 2015 LibQUAL+ Survey of Old Dominion University Libraries users
There is a growing body of literature on the development of the Association of Research Libraries (A...
Benchmarking data for the LibQUAL+ survey administered at the University of New England Libraries in...
Summary of user group comments from the LibQUAL+ survey administered at the University of New Englan...
This paper shares the Georgia Southern University Library’s experience of LibQUAL in user-centered a...
Executive Summary of a LibQUAL survey administered at the University of New England Libraries in 200...
2016 LibQUAL+ Survey branch analysis for the Lawrence V. Johnson Library of the KSU Library System,
The University Library at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) Services Advisory Co...
Cornell University Library's (CUL's) 2002 LibQUAL+ results. This report was produced by LibQUAL+ fo...
Mr. King offers suggestions on how to create and use surveys effectively to assess the quality of a ...
In 2015, LIBER commissioned the “Working group on Research and Education”. The goal was to collect b...