In this paper we will examine how experts from certain epistemic networks behave in the circumstances of a crisis. Our main goal is to show rhetorical strategies experts use to strengthen their own epistemic authority. We will do that by analysing experts’ strategies used in two pandemics: the one caused by A h1n1 virus in 2009 and the current pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2. There are four different, but interrelated, rhetorical strategies, that epistemic experts use to consolidate their epistemic authority. Two are internally oriented and consist of 1) experts providing additional reasons for why the measures they propose in the time of crises are rational and (2) experts emphasising their own responsibilities in the crises. Experts also us...
As illustrated by the COVID-19 pandemic, risk and crisis communication are crucial responsibilities ...
Much applied linguistic research has investigated how experts from different disciplines - different...
Existing research on factors informing public perceptions of expert trustworthiness was largely cond...
In this paper we will examine how experts from certain epistemic networks behave in the circumstance...
The primary focus of this research is the epistemic crisis of the scientific expert community. It ex...
In the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic, medical experts (virologists, epidemiologists, public health scholars...
The main aim of this paper is to consider how various types of social crises create contexts in whic...
A consistent claim from governments around the world during the Coronavirus pandemic has been that t...
The COVID-19 crisis has led to the growing intervention of scientific experts in the decision-making...
As illustrated by the COVID-19 pandemic, risk and crisis communication are crucial responsibilities ...
What should rational agents who want to act morally do during a pandemic: think for themselves or fo...
A description is made of the global epistemological crisis arising from the Covid-19 pandemic; the r...
This paper aims at clarifying a timely topic of how communication strategy choices are made in evolv...
This paper aims at clarifying a timely topic of how communication strategy choices are made in evolv...
Epistemic paternalism is the practice of interfering in the process of inquiry of another,without pr...
As illustrated by the COVID-19 pandemic, risk and crisis communication are crucial responsibilities ...
Much applied linguistic research has investigated how experts from different disciplines - different...
Existing research on factors informing public perceptions of expert trustworthiness was largely cond...
In this paper we will examine how experts from certain epistemic networks behave in the circumstance...
The primary focus of this research is the epistemic crisis of the scientific expert community. It ex...
In the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic, medical experts (virologists, epidemiologists, public health scholars...
The main aim of this paper is to consider how various types of social crises create contexts in whic...
A consistent claim from governments around the world during the Coronavirus pandemic has been that t...
The COVID-19 crisis has led to the growing intervention of scientific experts in the decision-making...
As illustrated by the COVID-19 pandemic, risk and crisis communication are crucial responsibilities ...
What should rational agents who want to act morally do during a pandemic: think for themselves or fo...
A description is made of the global epistemological crisis arising from the Covid-19 pandemic; the r...
This paper aims at clarifying a timely topic of how communication strategy choices are made in evolv...
This paper aims at clarifying a timely topic of how communication strategy choices are made in evolv...
Epistemic paternalism is the practice of interfering in the process of inquiry of another,without pr...
As illustrated by the COVID-19 pandemic, risk and crisis communication are crucial responsibilities ...
Much applied linguistic research has investigated how experts from different disciplines - different...
Existing research on factors informing public perceptions of expert trustworthiness was largely cond...