DRAGOJLA, IVANA, MANI – SUBVERSION AS DIALOGUE?

U radu se razmatraju dnevnički zapisi dviju hrvatskih autorica, Dragojle Jarnević (1812. – 1875.) i Ivane Brlić-Mažuranić (1874. – 1938.) te autobiografski roman Fališ mi u proljeću, u jeseni, u ljetu, u zimi, Mani Gotovac (1939. – 2019.). Navedena djela svojim poetičkim obilježjima, u širokom smislu riječi, slijede matricu ženskog pisma, nerijetko obilježenog iskustvom traume. Trauma se često manifestira autodestruktivnošću književnog subjekta iskazanom na dvama načinima: specifičnom uporabom jezičnih elemenata i/ili, na sadržajnoj razini teksta, eksplicitnim govorom književnog subjekta o vlastitim autodestruktivnim porivima, potaknutima nemogućnošću uspostavljanja zadovoljavajućeg odnosa s važećim društvenim paradigmama – obuhvatit ćemo ih simbolično nazivom ‘autoriteti’. Uz pretežno subverzivan odnos prema autoritetima, što rezultira autodestruktivnošću književnog subjekta, uočljiv je u Jarnević i Brlić-Mažuranić, obrnuto recipročan odnos između dinamike izražavanja autodestruktivnog i uvažavanja metafizičkog kao jednog oblika autoriteta. Kod Gotovac je odnos prema metafizičkom drukčiji u odnosu na njezine prethodnice, riječ je o svojevrsnom modelu »doživljaja vjere u nevjeri« (Šimundža). Cilj je rada: (1) razmotriti različite manifestacije autodestruktivnoga u književnih subjekata, (2) razmotriti odnos autodestruktivnog i metafizičkog te (3) otvoriti mogućnost drukčijeg iščitavanja subverzivnog elementa ženskog pisma razmatranjem pitanja može li se subverzivan odnos prema autoritetima promatrati kao latentna tendencija prema uspostavljanju dijaloga s njima.The paper analyses the diaries of two Croatian authors, Dragojla Jarnević (1812 – 1875) and Ivana Brlić Mažuranić (1874 –1938), and Mani Gotovac’s autobiographic prose I Miss you in Spring, in Autumn, in Summer and in Winter. The poetic characteristics of said literary works follow the matrix of female literature, frequently marked by a traumatic experience. Trauma is manifested by the selfdestructive tendencies of the literary subject presented in two ways: by the specific use of linguistic elements and/or, at the level of content, through the authors` explicit narrative about their self-destructive tendencies. These tendencies were motivated by the authors` inability to establish a satisfactory relationship with the existing societal paradigms – symbolically denominated as authorities in this paper. This predominantly subversive attitude towards authorities, which results in the self-destructive tendencies of the literary subject, is particularly discernible in Jarnević and Brlić Mažuranić. These authors also exhibit an inversely reciprocal relationship between their self-destructive tendencies and their acknowledgment of the metaphysical domain as a form of authority. Gotovac`s attitude towards the metaphysical domain is different than that of Jarnević and Brlić Mažuranić; it is a sort of “experience of faith through infidelity” (Šimundža). The aim of this paper is: 1) to explore different manifestations of self-destructive tendencies in literary subjects, 2) to explore the relationship between self-destructive tendencies and the metaphysical domain, and 3) to enable the possibility of a different interpretation of the subversive element of female literature by tackling the issue of whether a subversive attitude towards authorities may be perceived as a latent tendency towards opening a dialogue with them