Imagination as the Important work Factor of One Television Reporter

Rad televizijskog reportera razlikuje se od rada drugih reportera, a najviše po tome što on „razmišlja” slikom. Njegov reporterski osjećaj za temu kojom se bavi zainteresirat će (ili neće) gledatelje da ostanu kraj malih ekrana i odgledaju prilog ili emisiju. Imaginacija je jedan od oblika vizualnog mišljenja, a usmjerena je na stvaranje javnog mnijenja. Imaginacija je i kreacija čovjekova uma, u ovom slučaju televizijskog reportera. U radu se analizira kako imaginacija utječe na gledatelje imajući na umu da sadržaj imaginacije može biti pozitivan i negativan. Traže se odgovori na pitanja gdje je točka dodira realnog i imaginarnog u radu televizijskog reportera, kako kritičko mišljenje autora televizijskog priloga, koje je suprotnost imaginaciji, utječe na rad televizijskog reportera. Kakav može biti i o čemu ovisi umjetnički doživljaj imajući na umu odnos imaginarnog i realnog? Gdje je u svim „televizijskim imaginarnim horizontima” mjesto kritičkom mišljenju koje je suprotnost imaginaciji? Živimo u vremenu kada se malo cijeni sposobnost da se dobro razmišlja zato što je ukorijenjeno stanovište da je to opasno za sve - za one na vlasti, za poslodavce, za novinare… Zato cilj imaginacije nije da se nešto zamišlja. Cilj je da svatko u sebi proizvede određeno iskustvo, doživljaj i počne pravilno razmišljati.Work of the television reporter is quit different from the activity of other reporters.i.e mostly diferent how to „thinks” in the manner of picture. His feel for the topic engaged (or not) one reporter against the viewers to stay at the TV screen and to watch the dish or show. Imagination is just one aspect of visual thinking. It is concentrated on the creation and formation of public opinion. Imagination is the creation of human mind as in the case of televisions reporter. The paper analyzes how imagination can be positive and negative. We are looking for answer at the question where is the point of contact between the real and imaginary in the work of TV reporters and how the critical opinion of the author may have influence at the televisions contributions which is opposite of imagination and as such may affect at the operation of a television reporter? What may be of which depends on the artistic experience taking into account the ratio of the imaginary and the real? Where is in all „imaginary television horizons” the place of critical thinking which is the opposite of the imagination? We live in a time when the price of a little ability is to think properly because it is rooted opinion and it may be dangerous for everyone for those in power, for employers, for journalists. Therefore the aim is not that the imagination has to be devise at something by itself. The aim is that each person produces a certain grade of own experience to begin to think correctly