DO WE STUDY THE WAR IN A MILITARY EDUCATION?

U radu se razmatraju dileme vezane uz vojno obrazovanje. Prilazi im se iz tri perspektive koje se međusobno prožimaju. Prva se odnosi na rat i njime uzrokovane učinke u rasponu od površne percepcije do dubljeg razumijevanja. U drugoj perspektivi polazište je samo obrazovanje, s odnosom osposobljavanja i obrazovanja kao dominirajućim pitanjem u raspravama vezanim za vojno obrazovanje. Treća perspektiva je utemeljena u posebnostima časničke profesije u vojnom okružju, u kojoj se, uz anomalije prouzrokovane birokratskom prirodom vojnih organizacija, u obzir uzimaju i o njima ukorijenjene predrasude civila. Interakcija složenosti rata s posebnostima vojne profesije i civilno-vojnim odnosima određuje ograničenja proučavanju rata u vojnom obrazovanju. Za nadilaženje tih ograničenja proučavanju rata, a time i ograničenja ukupnog vojnog obrazovanja presudan je vanjski civilni, a ne unutarnji vojni utjecaj.The dilemas conected with the military education are examinated through three interconnected perspectives.The first one is related to the war perceptions war in range from slight perceptions to the deeper understanding. The starting point in the second perspective is training – education relation as dominating issue in the military education discussions. The hird one is based on the officers proffesion specifities in the military environment, including anomalies caused by the bureaucratic nature of military organization and related civilian biases. War complexity interactions with particularity of military proffesion and civil-military relations defines the limitations of war styding in military education. In order to surpass these limitations related to the war study as well as to the entire military education it is inevitable to take into account that the external civilian impact is crucial