THE INDIVIDUAL DECISION AS A CONDITION FOR ASSESSING OF THE LEGALITY OF GENERAL ACTS IN AN OBJECTIVE ADMINISTRATIVE DISPUTE

U radu se razmatraju učinci novoga hrvatskog modela kontrole zakonitosti općih akata javnopravnih tijela kroz analizu utjecaja zakonskih pretpostavki za pokretanje postupka ocjene zakonitosti općih akata vezanih uz pojedinačnu od- luku javnopravnog tijela na postizanje cilja objektivnog upravnog spora. Rad se bavi usporedbom ustavnosudske i upravnosudske kontrole zakonitosti općih akata jedinica lokalne i područne (regionalne) samouprave, pravnih osoba s javnim ovlastima i pravnih osoba koje obavljaju javnu službu. Na temelju ana- lize postojećega zakonskog uređenja pretpostavki za pokretanje objektivnog upravnog spora i prakse Visokog upravnog suda Republike Hrvatske u pro- teklom četverogodišnjem razdoblju pokušava se odgovoriti na pitanje je li hr- vatski sustav objektivnog upravnog spora (na normativnoj razini i u praktičnoj primjeni) takav da osigurava ostvarenje cilja te vrste sudske kontrole zakonito- sti općih akata.This article analyses the effects of the new Croatian model that controls of the legality of the general acts of public bodies. The author has taken into consideration the legal requirements for initiating the procedure of evaluation of the legality of general acts, related to the individual decisions of public authority and their impact to the purpose of the objective administrative dispute. The author compares the constitutional and judicial control of the legality of general acts issued by local and regional self-government bodies, legal persons vested with public powers and legal persons that perform a public service. Based on the analysis of the current legal framework and the practice of the High Administrative Court of the Republic of Croatia in the last four years, the author tries to answer the question whether the Croatian system of objective administrative dispute can ensure the aim of this type of judicial control of the general acts