COMPLEX VERB FORMS IN THE TETRAEVANGELIUM OF HVAL\u27S MISCELLANY

U radu se analiziraju složeni glagolski oblici (perfekt, pluskvamperfekt, kondicional, futur prvi) u četveroevanđelju Hvalova zbornika. Zatečeno se stanje uspoređuje sa stanjem u tekstovima Divoševa evanđelja, Nikoljskoga evanđelja, Kopitarova evanđelja i Čajničkoga evanđelja, kao i sa stanjem u kanonskim starocrkvenoslavenskim tekstovima. Analiza se provodi uglavnom na morfološkoj razini, a onoliko koliko posvjedočeni složeni glagolski oblici dopuštaju, analiziraju se i fonološke i leksičke osobitosti četveroevanđelja Hvalova zbornika. Analizom je utvrđeno da se na morfološkoj i leksičkoj razini starocrkvenoslavenski obrasci dobro čuvaju, dok se na fonološkoj razini razmjerno često i sustavno pojavljuju inovativni elementi. Od arhaičnih crta ističe se očuvanost starih ličnih nastavaka te starih oblika pomoćnoga glagola biti u kondicionalnoj perifrazi. Inovacijom se na morfološkoj razini može smatrati tek sporadično posvjedočena futurska perfiraza sa svršenim prezentom glagola biti u funkciji pomoćnoga. Utjecaj vernakulara na fonološkoj se razini očituje u ikavskom refleksu jata i vokalizaciji, odnosno redukciji poluglasa. Razlike u odnosu na paralelne tekstove rijetke su i nesustavne, a ostvaruju se uglavnom na fonološkoj razini.This paper analyses the complex verb forms (perfect, pluperfect, conditional, future) in the Tetraevangelium of Hval’s Miscellany. The existing situation iscompared with the corresponding characteristics of the verb system in the texts of Divoš Gospel, Nikolja Gospel, Kopitar Gospel and Čajniče Gospel, as well as to the situation found in the canonical Old Church Slavonic texts. The analysis is conducted mainly on the morphological level, while the phonological and lexical features in the Tetraevangelium of Hval’s Miscellany are analysed to the degree allowed by the attested complex verb forms. The analysis of the parallel texts shows that the Old Church Slavonic patterns are more or less well-preserved on the morphological and lexical level, while on the phonological level some innovative elements appear quite often and systematically. Among the archaic features, the preservation of the old personal endings and old conditional forms of the auxiliary verb be is particularly notable. On the morphological level, only occasional appearances of a future periphrasis with the perfective present of the verb to be functioning as an auxiliary verb, bo̢demь-present, could be thought of as innovative. The influence of the vernacular on the phonological level is manifested in the Ikavian reflex of the jat vowel and the vocalisation or reduction of jers. In the comparison of the parallel texts, systematic and relevant differences are rarely found and are manifested mostly on the phonological level