RELATION BETWEEN SOCIOENVIRONMENTAL ORIENTATIONS<R>AND RELIGIOUS BELIEF

Uspoređuju se rezultati empirijskih istraživanja 1988. i 1992. godine na studentima sveučilišta u Zagrebu i Rijeci. Analizira se odnos ispitanika prema (a) kompleksu »priroda-tehnika-društvo«, (b) prema vjeri te (c) uspoređuje odnos prema vjeri s mišljenjima o kompleksu »priroda-tehnika- -društvo«. U odnosu na 1988: - u 1992. godini smanjena je prosječna prihvaćenost antropocentričkih tvrdnji i povećana osjetljivost prema prirodnoj ravnoteži; - 1992. godini nije se promijenio postotak »uvjerenih vjernika« (16%) niti onih koji »nisu sigurni jesu li ili nisu vjernici« (8%). Povećan je postotak onih koji »vjeruju, ali ne prihvaćaju sve što vjera i crkva propovijedaju« (od 24% na 4l%), a smanjen je postotak onih koji »ne vjeruju« (od 51% na 34%); - 1992. godini nije se promijenio odnos između osobnog stava prema vjeri i mišljenja o kompleksu »priroda-tehnika-društvo«. - mišljenja »vjernika« i »ne-vjernika« o kompleksu »priroda-tehnika-društvo« značajno se razlikuju: »vjernici« više prihvaćaju »antropocentričku« orijentaciju, što se objašnjava religioznim iskustvom vjernika. Razlike »vjernika« i »ne-vjernika« prema »tehnocentrizmu« i »naturalizmu« nisu značajne, što se objašnjava svjetovnim iskustvom i »vjernika« i »ne-vjernika«. Između 1988. i 1992. godine došlo je u Hrvatskoj do socijalno-političkih promjena, kojima se može objasniti samo dio promjena u odnosu prema vjeri. Promjene u socijalnoekološkim orijentacijama treba tumačiti promjenama civilizacijskih vrijednosti.Hier werden die Ergebnisse von den zwei Forschungen (1988. und 1992.) in einem Vergleich eingestellt. Der Autor analysiert die Beziehung der Prüflinge zum a) Komplex "Natur - Technik - Gesellschaft", b) zur Religion, c) man vergleicht die Beziehung zur Religion mit dem Beziehung zum Komplex "Natur - Technik - Gesellschaft" damit kommt man zu folgenden Ergebnisse: 1. Zwischen 1988. und 1992. entstand eine Verminderung von den durchschnittlichen Annehmbarkeit der antropozentrischen Behauptungen und eine Steigerung der Empfindlichkeit der Prüflinge von Naturgleichgewicht. 2. In 1988. und in 1992. wurde das Prozent der "überzeugten Glaubigen" (16%) und dieser die "nicht bescheid wissen ob sie die Gläubigen sind" (8%) nicht verändert. Das Prozent von diesen die "glauben, aber die nicht in alles was Kirche und Religion predigen" wurde vergrössert (von 24% zu 41%), und das Prozent von diesen "die keine Gläubigen sind" wurde vermindert. 3. In 1992. wurde die Beziehung zwischen der persönlichen Stellung zur Religion und der Meinung über dem Komplex "Natur - Technik - Gesellschaft" nicht verändert. 4. Es ist bestätigt, das "die Glaubigen" mehr bedeutlich die "antropozentrische" Orientirungen annehmen, und dass sie mehr Sensibilität zu Natur haben. Die Unterschiede und Ähnlichkeite zwischen "Glaubigen" und "Nicht-Glaubigen wurden erklärt durch das Beständnis der weltlichen und religiöse Erfahrungen.The results of two research projects (in 1988 and 1992) are being compared. The author analyzes an attitude of respondents toward (a) a complex "nature-technique-society", (b) toward religion and (c) compares a relation toward religion with opinions on the complex "nature-technique-society" and comes to following conclusions: Between 1988 and 1992 a decrease of average acceptability of anthropocentric assertions turned up and an increase of susceptibility toward natural balance; In 1988 and 1992, a percentage of "convinced congregations" (16%) has not changed nor of those "who are not sure if they are or they are not congregations" (8%). A percentage of respondents who "believe, but do not accept all that a religion and a church preach" has increased (from 24% to 41%) and a percentage of those who "do not believe" has decreased (from 51% to 34%); In 1992, a relation between a personal attitude toward religion and opinion on the complex "nature-technique-society" has not changed. Significant differences have been established between "congregations" and "non-congregations" concerning the opinions on the complex "nature-technique-society". "Congregations" accept more significantly the "anthropocentric" orientation and are more susceptible toward natural balance. The differences and the similarities are explained by the existence of different experiences - secular and religious