Bach fails to give a satisfactory pragmatic account of referential uses of definite descriptions because he does not explain how a description’s quantificational meaning plays a “key role” in those uses. Bach’s criticism that my semantic account does not explain how the hearer understands a description is misguided. Bach’s denial that a pragmatic account is committed to the attributive use being more fundamental detaches meaning from use in an unacceptable way
The semantics of definite descriptions has been a central topic in philosophy of language ever since...
Although Strawson’s main aim in “On Referring ” was to argue that definite descriptions can be used ...
The standard Gricean defense of Russell in the face of referential uses of descriptions has been to ...
Bach fails to give a satisfactory pragmatic account of referential uses of definite descriptions bec...
This paper continues an ongoing debate between Michael Devitt and me on referential uses of definite...
grantor: University of TorontoIn "Reference and Definite Descriptions", Keith Donnellan in...
Keith Donnellan (1966) contrasted two uses of definite descriptions, the referential and the attribu...
In this paper I respond to the objections put forth by Kresimir Agbaba 22: 1-6) against my earlier p...
The scope of this short paper is to show that the examples İlhan İnan uses to undermine Donnellan’...
In this essay I argue that given Donnellan’s formulation of the attributive uses of definite descrip...
There are two sorts of singular terms for which we have difficulty applying Donnellan’s referential/...
Amongst those who have analysed definite descriptions as referential, most have considered them to b...
Definite descriptions (e.g. 'The king of France in 1997', 'The teacher of Aristotle') do not stand f...
I enumerate the main disagreements between Devitt and me, and then elucidate the most fundamental on...
Donnellan’s recently published Essays on Reference, Language, and Mind (2012) collect his seminal pa...
The semantics of definite descriptions has been a central topic in philosophy of language ever since...
Although Strawson’s main aim in “On Referring ” was to argue that definite descriptions can be used ...
The standard Gricean defense of Russell in the face of referential uses of descriptions has been to ...
Bach fails to give a satisfactory pragmatic account of referential uses of definite descriptions bec...
This paper continues an ongoing debate between Michael Devitt and me on referential uses of definite...
grantor: University of TorontoIn "Reference and Definite Descriptions", Keith Donnellan in...
Keith Donnellan (1966) contrasted two uses of definite descriptions, the referential and the attribu...
In this paper I respond to the objections put forth by Kresimir Agbaba 22: 1-6) against my earlier p...
The scope of this short paper is to show that the examples İlhan İnan uses to undermine Donnellan’...
In this essay I argue that given Donnellan’s formulation of the attributive uses of definite descrip...
There are two sorts of singular terms for which we have difficulty applying Donnellan’s referential/...
Amongst those who have analysed definite descriptions as referential, most have considered them to b...
Definite descriptions (e.g. 'The king of France in 1997', 'The teacher of Aristotle') do not stand f...
I enumerate the main disagreements between Devitt and me, and then elucidate the most fundamental on...
Donnellan’s recently published Essays on Reference, Language, and Mind (2012) collect his seminal pa...
The semantics of definite descriptions has been a central topic in philosophy of language ever since...
Although Strawson’s main aim in “On Referring ” was to argue that definite descriptions can be used ...
The standard Gricean defense of Russell in the face of referential uses of descriptions has been to ...