STILOVI PRIVRŽENOSTI IZ PERSPEKTIVE RANIH MALADAPTIVNIH SHEMA

The goal of the research is to test the significance of differences between attachment patterns in terms of frequency of early maladaptive schemas, particularly aimed at better understanding of insecure attachment patterns. The study was conducted on the sample of students of the Faculty of Philosophy in Nis (N=290). Attachment was assessed by the RQ questionnaire (Relationship Questionnaire, Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991.). Early maladaptive schemas were operationalized and measured by a short form of the Young Schema Questionnaire (Young, Klosko & Weishaar, 2003.). The results show that the groups of respondents, formed according to the attachment patterns, differ significantly in relation to the expression of early maladaptive schemas. Early maladaptive forms are significantly more present in groups of insecurely attached respondents. The finding that the highest total score on the Young Schema Questionnaire is achieved by respondents with disorganized attachment patterns is particularly important.Cilj istraživanja je testirati značajnost razlike između stilova privrženosti u smislu učestalosti ranih maladaptivnih shema, posebno radi boljeg razumijevanja nesigurnih stilova privrženosti. Istraživanje je provedeno na uzorku studenata Filozofskog fakulteta u Nišu (N=290). Privrženost je procijenjena pomoću Upitnika privrženosti RQ (Relationship Questionnaire, Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991). Rane maladaptivne sheme su operacionalizirane i izmjerene pomoću skraćenog oblika Upitnika Young Schema Questionnaire (Young, Klosko & Weishaar, 2003). Rezultati pokazuju da postoje značajne razlike među skupinama ispitanika grupiranim prema stilovima privrženosti u odnosu na izraz ranih maladaptivnih shema. Rani maladaptivni oblici značajno su više prisutni u skupinama ispitanika s nesigurnom privrženošću. Posebno se važnim čini nalaz da najviši ukupni rezultat na Upitniku Young Schema Questionnaire postižu ispitanici s neorganiziranim stilom privrženosti