The Administration of Goods

Autor obrađuje materiju koja se nalazi u Naslovu II. Upravljanje dobrima, Knjige V. Zakonika kanonskoga prava, a sastoji se od 17 kanona (kann. 1273-1289). Novi normativni izvori na temu vremenitih crkvenih dobara, koji proizlaze iz sustavnog aparata Zakonika, nadahnuti su, među ostalim, i načelom imovinskog jedinstva kao odrazom zajedništva crkvenih dobara što je izravna posljedica jedinstva njihovih svrha i njihovih namjena u spasenjskom poslanju same Crkve, zajamčenih primatskom jurisdikcijom i ujedno sudjelovanjem svih partikularnih crkava, fizičkih i pravnih osoba u brizi za potrebe opće Crkve. Treba imati u vidu da se upravljanje dobrima razlikuje od stjecanja i otuđenja, jer u protivnom ne bi imala smisla razlika koju donosi sam zakonodavac. Autor je članka posebnu pozornost usmjerio na važnost razlike između redovitog i izvanrednog upravljanja zbog posebnih uvjeta određenih za zaštitu javnog interesa. Upravitelji ili ekonomi imaju samo zadaću redovitog upravljanja. Čim se ulazi u područje izvanrednog upravljanja, prijeko je potreban zahvat poglavara pravne osobe. Upravljanje crkvenim dobrima mješovita je materija u kojoj je Crkva oduvijek poklanjala veliku pozornost odredbama koje je izdavalo građansko uređenje u kojem je djelovala, a kada je sklapala ugovore s pojedinim državama, uključivala je i taj predmet među teme koje su postale objektom ugovornih obveza.The author analyses the content contained in Title II, The Administration of Goods, Book V of The Code of Canon Law, composed of seventeen canons (Cann. 1273-1289). New normative choices on the theme of ecclesiastical temporal goods, emanating from the systematic apparatus of the Code, is inspired amongst other things, by the principle of unity of estate as a reflection of community of ecclesiastical goods which is the direct result of the unity of their goals and intentions in the salvific mission of the Church itself, guaranteed by the primacy of jurisdiction along with the cooperation of all particular churches, physical and juridical persons, in the care of the needs of the general Church. It is necessary to take into account the fact that the administration of goods differs from their acquisition and alienation, since there would be no point in legislature making the distinction. The author of the article has directed special attention to the importance of the difference between ordinary and extraordinary administration in specially defined circumstances for the protection of public interest. The administrator or steward has the exercise of only ordinary administration. Regarding the area of extraordinary administration, it is absolutely necessary that undertaking by done by the superior of the juridical person. Administration of ecclesiastical goods is a complex topic, in which the Church has always paid special attention to precepts instigated by civil institutions in which she has operated. On occasions when the Church has contracted agreements with governments, she has incorporated this aspect of her operation among the topics in agreed liabilities