Homosexual marriage: The Victory of Political Correctness and Bad Arguments

Mnogi zapadni intelektualci, posebno oni u humanističkim i društvenim znanostima, smatraju da je lako pokazati kako je kontinuirano i masovno protivljenje homoseksualnom braku racionalno neodrživo te da je ono puki rezultat predrasude ili vjerskog fanatizma. Međutim, pažljivija analiza nekih od tih naširoko prihvaćenih argumenata protiv konzervativnog stajališta otkriva da su ti argumenti zapravo zasnovani na logičkim pogreškama i na ozbiljnom iskrivljavanju konzervativne kritike homoseksualnog braka. Zaključak je da bi se filozofi trebali oduprijeti pritisku političke korektnosti i da bi trebali pristupiti ovoj raspravi otvorenijeg duha nego do sada.Many Western intellectuals, especially those in humanities and social sciences, think that it can be easily shown that the persistent and massive opposition to same-sex marriage is rationally indefensible and that it is merely a result of prejudice or religious fanaticism. But a more detailed analysis of some of these widely accepted arguments against the conservative position reveals that these arguments are in fact based on logical fallacies and serious distortions of conservative criticisms of homosexual marriage. It is concluded that philosophers ought to resist the pressure of political correctness and that they should approach the debate with a more open mind than before