This research is a normative juridical research. The nature of the expansion of the authority of the State Administrative Court as a result of the establishment of Law No. 30 of 2014 which expands the meaning of State Administrative Decrees and adds material for Government Administration Actions, causing an expansion of the authority of the State Administrative Court to receive, examine and adjudicate in resolving disputes over Government Actions which were previously not explicitly regulated in Law No. 51 of 2009
In the context of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration the competence of admin...
In the implementation of the state administrative decree, the principle of praesumtio iustae causa i...
Based on the Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration, and the Supreme Court regul...
After the emergence of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration, there has been an...
The Administrative Court and Law No. 5 of 1986 on State Administrative Justice have been provided fa...
Historically, State Administrative Court (PTUN) has existed since 1986, with the enactment of Law Nu...
The State Administrative Court is a judicial body that has absolute authority to examine and resolve...
After the enactment of Law no. 30 of 2014 Concerning Government Administration, the Concept of State...
This study aims to examine and analyze why an implementing regulation is needed for Act No. 51 of 20...
The State Administrative Court is established to anticipate the abuse of authority by the ruler and ...
Any change in the legislation, always cause changes / shifts in legal actions and legal consequences...
Law Number 5 of 1986 established Administrative Court as an institution authorized to resolve admi...
The subject of the study involves selected topics of administrative powers in the field of executing...
Agency or Officer in the state administration (office of the state administration) has broad authori...
Judicial power is done by a Supreme Court and judicial bodies under it, including the State administ...
In the context of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration the competence of admin...
In the implementation of the state administrative decree, the principle of praesumtio iustae causa i...
Based on the Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration, and the Supreme Court regul...
After the emergence of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration, there has been an...
The Administrative Court and Law No. 5 of 1986 on State Administrative Justice have been provided fa...
Historically, State Administrative Court (PTUN) has existed since 1986, with the enactment of Law Nu...
The State Administrative Court is a judicial body that has absolute authority to examine and resolve...
After the enactment of Law no. 30 of 2014 Concerning Government Administration, the Concept of State...
This study aims to examine and analyze why an implementing regulation is needed for Act No. 51 of 20...
The State Administrative Court is established to anticipate the abuse of authority by the ruler and ...
Any change in the legislation, always cause changes / shifts in legal actions and legal consequences...
Law Number 5 of 1986 established Administrative Court as an institution authorized to resolve admi...
The subject of the study involves selected topics of administrative powers in the field of executing...
Agency or Officer in the state administration (office of the state administration) has broad authori...
Judicial power is done by a Supreme Court and judicial bodies under it, including the State administ...
In the context of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration the competence of admin...
In the implementation of the state administrative decree, the principle of praesumtio iustae causa i...
Based on the Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration, and the Supreme Court regul...