It is generally acknowledged that discourse markers are used differently in speech and writing, yet many general descriptions and most annotation frameworks are written-based, thus partially unfit to be applied in spoken corpora. This paper identifies the major distinctive features of discourse markers in spoken language, which can be associated with problems related to their scope and structure, their meaning and their tendency to co-occur. The description is based on authentic examples and is followed by methodological recommendations on how to deal with these phenomena in more exhaustive, speech-friendly annotation models
Ambiguity in discourse is pervasive, yet mechanisms of production and processing suggest that it ten...
The topic of this presentation is methodological. It reports on an ongoing (manual) annotation exper...
International audienceThis paper reports on an experiment implementing a data-intensive approach to ...
It is generally acknowledged that discourse markers are used differently in speech and writing, yet ...
It is generally acknowledged that discourse markers are used differently in speech and writing, yet ...
Speech-to-speech translation technology has difficulties processing elements of spontaneity in conve...
Speech-to-speech translation technology has difficulties processing elements of spontaneity in conve...
Cross-linguistic studies of discourse markers often face various methodological problems regarding t...
Discourse markers and their functions have been modeled through a large number of very diverse frame...
Starting from the common observation that there is no recognized closed class of discourse markers (...
This paper discusses the relevance and challenges of a corpus-based investigation of the scope of di...
We report an annotation experiment aiming at assessing the use of a single functional taxonomy of se...
Discourse markers are non-propositional linguistic items that are notoriously difficult to identify ...
The present study is concerned with the issue of discourse markers as text forming devices in the En...
I use a discourse-annotated corpus to demonstrate a new method for identifying potential discourse m...
Ambiguity in discourse is pervasive, yet mechanisms of production and processing suggest that it ten...
The topic of this presentation is methodological. It reports on an ongoing (manual) annotation exper...
International audienceThis paper reports on an experiment implementing a data-intensive approach to ...
It is generally acknowledged that discourse markers are used differently in speech and writing, yet ...
It is generally acknowledged that discourse markers are used differently in speech and writing, yet ...
Speech-to-speech translation technology has difficulties processing elements of spontaneity in conve...
Speech-to-speech translation technology has difficulties processing elements of spontaneity in conve...
Cross-linguistic studies of discourse markers often face various methodological problems regarding t...
Discourse markers and their functions have been modeled through a large number of very diverse frame...
Starting from the common observation that there is no recognized closed class of discourse markers (...
This paper discusses the relevance and challenges of a corpus-based investigation of the scope of di...
We report an annotation experiment aiming at assessing the use of a single functional taxonomy of se...
Discourse markers are non-propositional linguistic items that are notoriously difficult to identify ...
The present study is concerned with the issue of discourse markers as text forming devices in the En...
I use a discourse-annotated corpus to demonstrate a new method for identifying potential discourse m...
Ambiguity in discourse is pervasive, yet mechanisms of production and processing suggest that it ten...
The topic of this presentation is methodological. It reports on an ongoing (manual) annotation exper...
International audienceThis paper reports on an experiment implementing a data-intensive approach to ...