Mountain grassland restoration using hay and brush material transfer combined with temporary wheat cover

International audienceMountain grassland restoration success may be hampered by limited seed dispersal and poor soil seed banks of many grassland species. These constraints can be overcome by actively introducing propagules from nearby non-degraded communities. We tested different restoration techniques in order to understand the mechanisms favouring target species seedling recruitment and establishment. In five degraded mountain grasslands, we analysed (i) the effect of two techniques increasingly used in ecological restoration to overcome low seed dispersal: transfer of brush-harvested seed material and hay transfer, and (ii) the potentially facilitative effect of a temporary plant cover (common wheat) on the recruitment of transferred brush-harvested propagules. We found that both propagule transfer techniques were successful in establishing plant species of the donor community with an increase of plant species richness, cover and abundance of transferred species. Hay transfer was more efficient in transferring species of the donor grassland than brush-harvested material transfer. Brush-harvested material transfer only increased abundance and cover of donor grassland species when sown together with wheat. The results indicated that hay mulch favoured seedling recruitment of target species, and that propagule transfer without hay mulch needs to be compensated by additional temporary plant cover in order to create favourable conditions for seedling recruitment. A comparison with best reference communities for each restoration grassland confirmed that hay transfer and brush material transfer with wheat sowing were successful in driving plant community composition towards the desired reference state. In conclusion, restoration of mountain grasslands with shallow and stony soils clearly benefits from a facilitative effect of dead (hay) or living (wheat) vegetation cover