Add to ORKGThe constitutional rules of the game for environmental and land-use advocates and commentators shifted noticeably during the October 1991 Term of the United States Supreme Court. This article considers the impact of three recent cases--Lucas, Yee, and PFZ--on the structure and patterns of federal takings law and on the strategy employed by those charged with challenging or supporting regulations that arguably effect a taking of private property in the public interest
This article, celebrating twenty years of the Virginia Environmental Law Journal, recounts the years...
As development creeps steadily outward from central cities to environmentally sensitive areas in the...
With the ascendancy of environmentalism in American law has come a renewed focus on private property...
Property rights are a hot political topic. In the last few years, the issue of regulatory takings ...
In 1987, the Supreme Court decided three cases involving takings challenges to governmental exerci...
This article argues that the Court\u27s reliance on the law of property neither creates an internal ...
Sponsored by the University of Colorado\u27s Natural Resources Law Center and the Byron R. White Cen...
Regulatory takings law today is criticized as a confused muddle, intractable, and as an ambiguous ar...
The U.S. Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council was celebrated by ...
Over the years, regulatory takings case law has supported land use regulations by cloaking them with...
The complicated arena of takings jurisprudence has confused lawyers, scholars, and courts for well o...
This three-part article examines the separate and combined legacies of Chief Justice William H. Rehn...
This article reviews the historical tradition in which the common law core of nuisance has been the ...
Conventional wisdom teaches that the Supreme Court\u27s takings doctrine is a muddle. Appearances, h...
This article explores the inconsistent doctrines advanced by the courts in determining regulatory ta...
This article, celebrating twenty years of the Virginia Environmental Law Journal, recounts the years...
As development creeps steadily outward from central cities to environmentally sensitive areas in the...
With the ascendancy of environmentalism in American law has come a renewed focus on private property...
Property rights are a hot political topic. In the last few years, the issue of regulatory takings ...
In 1987, the Supreme Court decided three cases involving takings challenges to governmental exerci...
This article argues that the Court\u27s reliance on the law of property neither creates an internal ...
Sponsored by the University of Colorado\u27s Natural Resources Law Center and the Byron R. White Cen...
Regulatory takings law today is criticized as a confused muddle, intractable, and as an ambiguous ar...
The U.S. Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council was celebrated by ...
Over the years, regulatory takings case law has supported land use regulations by cloaking them with...
The complicated arena of takings jurisprudence has confused lawyers, scholars, and courts for well o...
This three-part article examines the separate and combined legacies of Chief Justice William H. Rehn...
This article reviews the historical tradition in which the common law core of nuisance has been the ...
Conventional wisdom teaches that the Supreme Court\u27s takings doctrine is a muddle. Appearances, h...
This article explores the inconsistent doctrines advanced by the courts in determining regulatory ta...
This article, celebrating twenty years of the Virginia Environmental Law Journal, recounts the years...
As development creeps steadily outward from central cities to environmentally sensitive areas in the...
With the ascendancy of environmentalism in American law has come a renewed focus on private property...