Add to ORKGThis recent United States Supreme Court decision interprets 42 U.S.C. § 1981 as not allowing an action for racial harassment during employment. This note examines the antecedent cases to Patterson along with Congressional actions which appear to indicate a lack of tolerance of racial discrimination in the public and private sectors. The author concludes that Patterson is a step in the wrong direction and calls into question the commitment of the United States Supreme Court to move in the direction of eliminating workplace distinctions based on the race of the worker
This month the Supreme Court will hear reargument in Patterson v. McLean Credit Union on the questio...
The Civil Rights Act of 1991, which provides compensatory and punitive damages and attendant jury tr...
More than four decades ago, the Supreme Court concluded that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 19...
This Note argues that had the Patterson Court considered the evidence of congressional intent and co...
In Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, the United States Supreme Court held 42 U.S.C. § 1981 does not ...
Neither our words nor our decisions should be interpreted as signaling one inch of retreat from Cong...
This Note analyzes the holding in Patterson v. McLean Credit Union; provides a survey of the number ...
Employment discrimination on the basis of race, gender, and ethnicity has long plagued America’s wor...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes it an unlawful employment practice for an employer ...
When the Supreme Court invalidated a municipal minority business set-aside in City of Richmond v. J....
Despite employment gains made by women, older Americans, and racial and religious minorities, employ...
In its recent decision in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Co. v. White, the Supreme Court resolved th...
Employment discrimination laws make the “simple but momentous” declaration that it is illegal to den...
Under the doctrine of reverse incorporation, generally identified with the Supreme Court\u27s decisi...
In Goldsmith v. Bagby Elevator Company, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals carved a distinction i...
This month the Supreme Court will hear reargument in Patterson v. McLean Credit Union on the questio...
The Civil Rights Act of 1991, which provides compensatory and punitive damages and attendant jury tr...
More than four decades ago, the Supreme Court concluded that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 19...
This Note argues that had the Patterson Court considered the evidence of congressional intent and co...
In Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, the United States Supreme Court held 42 U.S.C. § 1981 does not ...
Neither our words nor our decisions should be interpreted as signaling one inch of retreat from Cong...
This Note analyzes the holding in Patterson v. McLean Credit Union; provides a survey of the number ...
Employment discrimination on the basis of race, gender, and ethnicity has long plagued America’s wor...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes it an unlawful employment practice for an employer ...
When the Supreme Court invalidated a municipal minority business set-aside in City of Richmond v. J....
Despite employment gains made by women, older Americans, and racial and religious minorities, employ...
In its recent decision in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Co. v. White, the Supreme Court resolved th...
Employment discrimination laws make the “simple but momentous” declaration that it is illegal to den...
Under the doctrine of reverse incorporation, generally identified with the Supreme Court\u27s decisi...
In Goldsmith v. Bagby Elevator Company, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals carved a distinction i...
This month the Supreme Court will hear reargument in Patterson v. McLean Credit Union on the questio...
The Civil Rights Act of 1991, which provides compensatory and punitive damages and attendant jury tr...
More than four decades ago, the Supreme Court concluded that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 19...