This article discusses three recent decisions of the Supreme Court of Illinois on the Illinois Estoppel Doctrine, which holds that an insurer that breaches its duty to defend will be estopped from denying coverage in any action by the insured to collect policy proceeds. The article explains how these decisions resolve disputes about the scope of the doctrine but leave open a crucial issue concerning an insurer's ability to protect against estoppel by promptly seeking a declaratory judgment as to its duties. The article observes that Illinois Appellate Court decisions conflict on the standard for testing the timeliness of such a declaratory action. The article evaluates the approaches taken on that question and recommends a resolution. A pri...
In Waltons Stores (Interstate) v Maher,3 the High Court revolutionised both promissory estoppel and ...
This Article analyzes the practice of plaintiff's motions for voluntary dismissals in Illinois Court...
This Article evaluates a conundrum and identifies a genuine risk faced by state and federal courts i...
The twenty-two years that have passed since the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its o...
This Article examines the Missouri Supreme Court’s decision in Shahan v. Shahan. What is interesting...
For many years, Illinois policyholders faced the prospect of a two-front war whenever they submitted...
When a liability insurer defends claims brought against its insured, its interests frequently come i...
In pursuit of a greater understanding of this controversial subject, this article will: (1) explore ...
Under Illinois’ rule against claim-splitting, a plaintiff is generally prohibited from maintaining s...
There is a prevailing view among jurists and practitioners that a declaratory judgment action is an ...
Government agencies increasingly are pursing enforcement actions and litigation against companies th...
For years the conflict of interest problem that occasionally arose out of the defense of an insured ...
In a previous paper, I suggested that the Missouri Supreme Court had adopted a forfeiture penalty fo...
Defendant issued a liability insurance policy to the manufacturer of a hair-waving product, an Illin...
Each year in America, an estimated $200 billion is spent purchasing third-party liability insurance....
In Waltons Stores (Interstate) v Maher,3 the High Court revolutionised both promissory estoppel and ...
This Article analyzes the practice of plaintiff's motions for voluntary dismissals in Illinois Court...
This Article evaluates a conundrum and identifies a genuine risk faced by state and federal courts i...
The twenty-two years that have passed since the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its o...
This Article examines the Missouri Supreme Court’s decision in Shahan v. Shahan. What is interesting...
For many years, Illinois policyholders faced the prospect of a two-front war whenever they submitted...
When a liability insurer defends claims brought against its insured, its interests frequently come i...
In pursuit of a greater understanding of this controversial subject, this article will: (1) explore ...
Under Illinois’ rule against claim-splitting, a plaintiff is generally prohibited from maintaining s...
There is a prevailing view among jurists and practitioners that a declaratory judgment action is an ...
Government agencies increasingly are pursing enforcement actions and litigation against companies th...
For years the conflict of interest problem that occasionally arose out of the defense of an insured ...
In a previous paper, I suggested that the Missouri Supreme Court had adopted a forfeiture penalty fo...
Defendant issued a liability insurance policy to the manufacturer of a hair-waving product, an Illin...
Each year in America, an estimated $200 billion is spent purchasing third-party liability insurance....
In Waltons Stores (Interstate) v Maher,3 the High Court revolutionised both promissory estoppel and ...
This Article analyzes the practice of plaintiff's motions for voluntary dismissals in Illinois Court...
This Article evaluates a conundrum and identifies a genuine risk faced by state and federal courts i...