Add to ORKGExplores joint representation of criminal co-defendants from the viewpoints of the ABA Code of Professional Responsibility and the sixth amendment right to effective assistance of counsel, suggesting that the presumption of effectiveness of joint counsel for indigent co-defendants constitutes a denial of equal protection
This Comment reviews the historical development of the right to effective assistance of counsel for...
Nearly a decade ago, the United States Supreme Court in McMann v. Richardson held that the sixth ame...
The ABA Criminal Justice Standards have been recognized by the Supreme Court as one of the most impo...
Conflicts of interest resulting from multiple representation in criminal cases impose heavy burdens ...
The sixth amendment provides that in all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to...
The Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees criminal defendants the right to counsel, an...
How should courts rule on the issue of joint defense agreements and motions for disqualification of ...
In an earlier era trial courts perceived their responsibility regarding the quality of legal assista...
Do the Sixth Amendment rights to appointed counsel and jury trial unconstitutionally conflict with d...
Slowly, courts are clarifying the scope of the attorney-client privilege that arises when codefendan...
In a trio of recent cases, Padilla v. Kentucky, Missouri v. Frye, and Lafler v. Cooper, the U.S. Sup...
AbstractThe paper aims to analyze a circumstance which emerged in practice, according to which a law...
There is a widely-held belief that the state provides counsel to indigent criminal defendants at the...
The pervasiveness of plea bargaining in our modern justice system has led too many courts to conclud...
Effective assistance of counsel. Massachusetts has been in the forefront of the nation in providing ...
This Comment reviews the historical development of the right to effective assistance of counsel for...
Nearly a decade ago, the United States Supreme Court in McMann v. Richardson held that the sixth ame...
The ABA Criminal Justice Standards have been recognized by the Supreme Court as one of the most impo...
Conflicts of interest resulting from multiple representation in criminal cases impose heavy burdens ...
The sixth amendment provides that in all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to...
The Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees criminal defendants the right to counsel, an...
How should courts rule on the issue of joint defense agreements and motions for disqualification of ...
In an earlier era trial courts perceived their responsibility regarding the quality of legal assista...
Do the Sixth Amendment rights to appointed counsel and jury trial unconstitutionally conflict with d...
Slowly, courts are clarifying the scope of the attorney-client privilege that arises when codefendan...
In a trio of recent cases, Padilla v. Kentucky, Missouri v. Frye, and Lafler v. Cooper, the U.S. Sup...
AbstractThe paper aims to analyze a circumstance which emerged in practice, according to which a law...
There is a widely-held belief that the state provides counsel to indigent criminal defendants at the...
The pervasiveness of plea bargaining in our modern justice system has led too many courts to conclud...
Effective assistance of counsel. Massachusetts has been in the forefront of the nation in providing ...
This Comment reviews the historical development of the right to effective assistance of counsel for...
Nearly a decade ago, the United States Supreme Court in McMann v. Richardson held that the sixth ame...
The ABA Criminal Justice Standards have been recognized by the Supreme Court as one of the most impo...