This casenote examines the Supreme Court's landmark ruling in United States v. Lopez, in which the Court struck down a Congressional enactment under the Commerce Clause for the first time in modern history. The note traces Commerce Clause jurisprudence back to the days of the Founding Fathers and analyzes the Lopez opinion in an historic context. It also provides an overview of how the lower federal courts have dealt with appeals based on the Lopez ruling and concludes that the federalism debate, which underlies the Court's 5-4 decision, has been renewed but not resolved
Federalism has moved to the forefront of constitutional analysis in recent years as a narrow majorit...
The Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in United States v. Lopez marks a revolutionary and long over...
Introduction to Symposium, The New Federalism After United States v. Lopez, Cleveland, Ohio, 1996
There are four areas in which the Supreme Court has in effect raised the power of federalism. The fi...
In this article, I explore the Supreme Court\u27s new definition of Commerce ... among the several ...
Almost sixty years after the revolution of 1937, we still do not have an adequate theory of the co...
This Note focuses on two important pieces of social-policy legislation that could be affected by Uni...
This Note focuses on two important pieces of social-policy legislation that could be affected by Uni...
The Commerce Clause has long been a constitutional powerhouse underlying federal legislation. The de...
The Commerce Clause has long been a constitutional powerhouse underlying federal legislation. The de...
This Note focuses on two important pieces of social-policy legislation that could be affected by Uni...
This Note critically examines the federalization of criminal law and the impact this trend is having...
The Commerce Clause has long been a constitutional powerhouse underlying federal legislation. The de...
This Note discusses the extent to which federal tort reform measures would be constitutionally valid...
Federalism has moved to the forefront of constitutional analysis in recent years as a narrow majorit...
Federalism has moved to the forefront of constitutional analysis in recent years as a narrow majorit...
The Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in United States v. Lopez marks a revolutionary and long over...
Introduction to Symposium, The New Federalism After United States v. Lopez, Cleveland, Ohio, 1996
There are four areas in which the Supreme Court has in effect raised the power of federalism. The fi...
In this article, I explore the Supreme Court\u27s new definition of Commerce ... among the several ...
Almost sixty years after the revolution of 1937, we still do not have an adequate theory of the co...
This Note focuses on two important pieces of social-policy legislation that could be affected by Uni...
This Note focuses on two important pieces of social-policy legislation that could be affected by Uni...
The Commerce Clause has long been a constitutional powerhouse underlying federal legislation. The de...
The Commerce Clause has long been a constitutional powerhouse underlying federal legislation. The de...
This Note focuses on two important pieces of social-policy legislation that could be affected by Uni...
This Note critically examines the federalization of criminal law and the impact this trend is having...
The Commerce Clause has long been a constitutional powerhouse underlying federal legislation. The de...
This Note discusses the extent to which federal tort reform measures would be constitutionally valid...
Federalism has moved to the forefront of constitutional analysis in recent years as a narrow majorit...
Federalism has moved to the forefront of constitutional analysis in recent years as a narrow majorit...
The Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in United States v. Lopez marks a revolutionary and long over...
Introduction to Symposium, The New Federalism After United States v. Lopez, Cleveland, Ohio, 1996