The author undertakes a critical review of the role of public participation in the Illinois waste facility siting statute, concluding that the statute, as currently written, interpreted and implemented supplies only one demonstrable criterion from which county boards make siting decisions--public opposition. Recognizing that appeals from local siting denials are seldom fruitful for waste management developers, the author explores two constitutional responses to the Illinois siting scheme. First the author provides statutory and regulatory bases for application of preemption doctrine and further demonstrates that a basis for preemption of the Illinois statute may be forthcoming as Congress recognizes waste capacity shortfalls on the national...
In Smith v. Town of Pittston, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court, sitting as the Law Court, upheld a m...
In Kelo v. City of New London, the United States Supreme Court emphasized its longstanding practice ...
Many Illinois municipalities impose exactions, or impact fees, on new housing developments. Appropri...
On September 26, 2006, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in United Haulers Association Inc. v. ...
Abstract. Local community opposition constitutes the single greatest hurdle to the siting of hazardo...
The siting of hazardous and nuclear waste facilities has proven to be a task of enormous difficulty ...
The meaning of law resides not in the statute but in its interpreter. The mode of interpretation use...
Last term, for the first time since its watershed decision in Philadelphia v. New Jersey, the Suprem...
The enactment of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the expansion of the scope of...
Includes bibliographical references.The Illinois laws and regulations which pertain to hazardous was...
Regulatory takings law today is criticized as a confused muddle, intractable, and as an ambiguous ar...
This study explores the dilemma associated with high-level waste disposal, first by recounting the h...
In Whose Backyard, Whose Risk, environmental lawyer, professor, and commentator Michael B. Gerrard t...
The fifth amendment to the United States Constitution, as well as most state constitutions, provides...
Since its inception in the 1980s, advocates of the environmental justice movement have attempted to ...
In Smith v. Town of Pittston, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court, sitting as the Law Court, upheld a m...
In Kelo v. City of New London, the United States Supreme Court emphasized its longstanding practice ...
Many Illinois municipalities impose exactions, or impact fees, on new housing developments. Appropri...
On September 26, 2006, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in United Haulers Association Inc. v. ...
Abstract. Local community opposition constitutes the single greatest hurdle to the siting of hazardo...
The siting of hazardous and nuclear waste facilities has proven to be a task of enormous difficulty ...
The meaning of law resides not in the statute but in its interpreter. The mode of interpretation use...
Last term, for the first time since its watershed decision in Philadelphia v. New Jersey, the Suprem...
The enactment of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the expansion of the scope of...
Includes bibliographical references.The Illinois laws and regulations which pertain to hazardous was...
Regulatory takings law today is criticized as a confused muddle, intractable, and as an ambiguous ar...
This study explores the dilemma associated with high-level waste disposal, first by recounting the h...
In Whose Backyard, Whose Risk, environmental lawyer, professor, and commentator Michael B. Gerrard t...
The fifth amendment to the United States Constitution, as well as most state constitutions, provides...
Since its inception in the 1980s, advocates of the environmental justice movement have attempted to ...
In Smith v. Town of Pittston, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court, sitting as the Law Court, upheld a m...
In Kelo v. City of New London, the United States Supreme Court emphasized its longstanding practice ...
Many Illinois municipalities impose exactions, or impact fees, on new housing developments. Appropri...