This article discusses the consequences that the United States Supreme Court decision in Dolan v. City of Tigard has had on the ability of local land use regulators to impose development impact fees. The author notes that Dolan allows local land use regulators to utilize a "rough proportionality" test for determining the amount of development impact fees that may be assessed, and the author provides cogent examples of calculating and documenting such fees in the city of Elgin, Illinois
This Article analyzes the evolution of impact fees in a number of states that have had the longest e...
An impact fee is a charge levied upon real estate developers to pay for infrastructure required by a...
The United States Supreme Court held that in order to survive a takings challenge, a development exa...
As state and federal funding for public improvements steadily declines and is outstripped by demand,...
One of the lingering questions about the law of regulatory takings concerns the proper scope and app...
Over the last thirty years local governments have increasingly relied on development exactions as a ...
Many Illinois municipalities impose exactions, or impact fees, on new housing developments. Appropri...
A development impact fee is defined as “payment of money imposed upon development as a condition to...
Development impact fee systems are a controversial topic among developers and planners. This article...
Federal Highway Administration2018PDFBriefUnited States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of I...
Approximately 60 percent of U.S. cities with more than 25,000 residents now impose impact fees to fu...
Ohio is among the twenty-two states that have no enabling legislation for development impact fees. B...
This study has presented a comprehensive overview of the effective use of development impact fees in...
A Practitioner\u27s Guide to Development Impact Fees. By James C. Nicholas, Arthur C. Nelson, and J...
This study investigated impact fees used by counties and communities to pay for infracture costs req...
This Article analyzes the evolution of impact fees in a number of states that have had the longest e...
An impact fee is a charge levied upon real estate developers to pay for infrastructure required by a...
The United States Supreme Court held that in order to survive a takings challenge, a development exa...
As state and federal funding for public improvements steadily declines and is outstripped by demand,...
One of the lingering questions about the law of regulatory takings concerns the proper scope and app...
Over the last thirty years local governments have increasingly relied on development exactions as a ...
Many Illinois municipalities impose exactions, or impact fees, on new housing developments. Appropri...
A development impact fee is defined as “payment of money imposed upon development as a condition to...
Development impact fee systems are a controversial topic among developers and planners. This article...
Federal Highway Administration2018PDFBriefUnited States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of I...
Approximately 60 percent of U.S. cities with more than 25,000 residents now impose impact fees to fu...
Ohio is among the twenty-two states that have no enabling legislation for development impact fees. B...
This study has presented a comprehensive overview of the effective use of development impact fees in...
A Practitioner\u27s Guide to Development Impact Fees. By James C. Nicholas, Arthur C. Nelson, and J...
This study investigated impact fees used by counties and communities to pay for infracture costs req...
This Article analyzes the evolution of impact fees in a number of states that have had the longest e...
An impact fee is a charge levied upon real estate developers to pay for infrastructure required by a...
The United States Supreme Court held that in order to survive a takings challenge, a development exa...