Illinois is currently the only state that allows the forcible eviction of a condominium unit owner for failing to pay his monthly association dues. In Spanish Court Two Condominium Association v. Carlson, the Illinois Supreme Court was asked to determine whether the Illinois Condominium Property Act and the Forcible Entry and Detainer Act allow a unit owner to affirmatively defend against a forcible eviction by asserting that the condominium association was negligent in maintaining the condominium common areas. In a 4-3 decision, the Illinois Supreme Court held that such an affirmative defense is not “germane to the distinct purpose of the proceeding” as is required by the Forcible Entry and Detainer Act. This Comment explores and questions...
This Article has several objectives. Part I provides a foundation for discussion by briefly outlinin...
The unlawful occupation of private land creates a tension between the interests of the unlawful occu...
This article discusses a California case which held that an ordinance requiring the landlord to evic...
By exploiting the highly ambiguous Section 15 of the Illinois Condominium Property Act, developers a...
This Article will discuss and analyze the treatment of contested cases in the eviction courtrooms of...
Crime-free housing ordinances allow municipalities to force private landlords to evict tenants who h...
ABSTRACT The Illinois Appellate Court in Draper & Kramer v. King reversed a court ordered eviction o...
Any misstep in this jurisdictional minefield along the road to an eviction can be costly. Even thoug...
In late January 2013, the Third District Court of Appeal sent shockwaves throughout the real estate ...
In recent years, the number of conversions of rental apartments to cooperative and condominium owner...
The One-Strike Rule, contemplated in a model lease provision, has been the primary mechanism employe...
Edwards v. Habib is a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia ...
Explores the different levels of protection against arbitrary eviction for Ontario residents of subs...
Statutory condominium regimes facilitate massive increases in the density of owners. The courts are ...
This article discusses a California case which held that a complaint that an ordinance prohibiti...
This Article has several objectives. Part I provides a foundation for discussion by briefly outlinin...
The unlawful occupation of private land creates a tension between the interests of the unlawful occu...
This article discusses a California case which held that an ordinance requiring the landlord to evic...
By exploiting the highly ambiguous Section 15 of the Illinois Condominium Property Act, developers a...
This Article will discuss and analyze the treatment of contested cases in the eviction courtrooms of...
Crime-free housing ordinances allow municipalities to force private landlords to evict tenants who h...
ABSTRACT The Illinois Appellate Court in Draper & Kramer v. King reversed a court ordered eviction o...
Any misstep in this jurisdictional minefield along the road to an eviction can be costly. Even thoug...
In late January 2013, the Third District Court of Appeal sent shockwaves throughout the real estate ...
In recent years, the number of conversions of rental apartments to cooperative and condominium owner...
The One-Strike Rule, contemplated in a model lease provision, has been the primary mechanism employe...
Edwards v. Habib is a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia ...
Explores the different levels of protection against arbitrary eviction for Ontario residents of subs...
Statutory condominium regimes facilitate massive increases in the density of owners. The courts are ...
This article discusses a California case which held that a complaint that an ordinance prohibiti...
This Article has several objectives. Part I provides a foundation for discussion by briefly outlinin...
The unlawful occupation of private land creates a tension between the interests of the unlawful occu...
This article discusses a California case which held that an ordinance requiring the landlord to evic...