Add to ORKGHarpootlian argues that President Elect Donald Trump\u27s treatment of facts throughout the campaign presents cause for concern. Specifically, Harpootlian argues that the courtroom is designed to rely on evidence. Harpootlian worries that this reliance is threatened by the fact that President Trump flouted and ignored evidence which was unfavorable towards him. Harpootlian fears a similar disregard for evidence in favor of results driven decisions taking root in the courtroom
Part I of this article briefly discusses the concept of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, along with ...
Prosecutors have developed several tactics to effectively lower the burden of proof in criminal tria...
Members of the U.S. House of Representatives heard testimony last week from two current U.S. Departm...
This Article examines a disturbing trend in civil litigation: the demise of the jury’s historic prer...
The government’s duty to disclose favorable evidence to the defense under Brady v. Maryland has beco...
The American Bar Association (ABA) filed an amicus brief1 in the Boston Marathon bombing case that t...
(Excerpt) This Essay analyzes the role of the courts in handling Trump’s election lie. It argues tha...
Although the jury trial is regarded as a lynchpin of the American concept of justice, ambivalence ab...
There is no shortage of claims by parties that their prosecutions are politically motivated, raciall...
Much of what we tell ourselves about the Rules of Evidence—that they serve as an all-seeing gatekeep...
In 2020 and then again in 2021, former President Donald John Trump faced an impeachment trial. Prior...
In January 2003, President George W. Bush invoked the supposed failings of the civil jury as the rat...
Every now and again, we get a look, usually no more than a glimpse, at how the justice system really...
The jury trial plays a critical constitutional and institutional role in American jurisprudence. Jur...
The Framers of the Sixth and Seventh Amendments to the United States Constitution recognized that ju...
Part I of this article briefly discusses the concept of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, along with ...
Prosecutors have developed several tactics to effectively lower the burden of proof in criminal tria...
Members of the U.S. House of Representatives heard testimony last week from two current U.S. Departm...
This Article examines a disturbing trend in civil litigation: the demise of the jury’s historic prer...
The government’s duty to disclose favorable evidence to the defense under Brady v. Maryland has beco...
The American Bar Association (ABA) filed an amicus brief1 in the Boston Marathon bombing case that t...
(Excerpt) This Essay analyzes the role of the courts in handling Trump’s election lie. It argues tha...
Although the jury trial is regarded as a lynchpin of the American concept of justice, ambivalence ab...
There is no shortage of claims by parties that their prosecutions are politically motivated, raciall...
Much of what we tell ourselves about the Rules of Evidence—that they serve as an all-seeing gatekeep...
In 2020 and then again in 2021, former President Donald John Trump faced an impeachment trial. Prior...
In January 2003, President George W. Bush invoked the supposed failings of the civil jury as the rat...
Every now and again, we get a look, usually no more than a glimpse, at how the justice system really...
The jury trial plays a critical constitutional and institutional role in American jurisprudence. Jur...
The Framers of the Sixth and Seventh Amendments to the United States Constitution recognized that ju...
Part I of this article briefly discusses the concept of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, along with ...
Prosecutors have developed several tactics to effectively lower the burden of proof in criminal tria...
Members of the U.S. House of Representatives heard testimony last week from two current U.S. Departm...