Perry v. Brown, the federal lawsuit challenging Proposition 8--the California state constitutional amendment prohibiting marriage for same-sex couples--was filed in 2009. At that time, it presented sweeping federal constitutional claims for marriage equality and sought to ultimately put those claims before the U.S. Supreme Court. The suit defied the strategic vision of lawyers at the leading lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) legal organizations--Lambda Legal, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR), and Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders (GLAD). Those lawyers had attempted to keep the federal courts away from Proposition 8 and similar state laws. Yet a new organization, the Amer...
This paper attempts to trace the links between the Lawrence v. Texas decision and campaigns for gay ...
This chapter considers how the LGBT movement might pursue legal equality — alongside lived equality ...
Case, Hollingsworth v. Perry?\u27 Does the state\u27s reinstatement of the exclusion of lesbian and ...
Perry v. Brown, the federal lawsuit challenging Proposition 8-the California state constitutional am...
This Article discusses the progression of Perry from the filing of the case to its current status be...
In Perry v. Brown, the Ninth Circuit ruled that California’s Proposition 8 violates the Equal Protec...
The summer of 2013 saw a troubling social justice whiplash. On June 26th, in two separate decisions ...
In Perry v. Schwarzenegger, Chief Judge Vaughn Walker held that Proposition 8 — an amendment to the ...
On May 15, 2008, the California Supreme Court issued its historic decision regarding marriage rights...
This thesis looks at the state of marriage equality activism in the wake of the Supreme Court’s June...
Why, in the face of ongoing criticism, do advocates of same-sex marriage continue to pursue litigati...
This commentary previews an upcoming Supreme Court case, Hollingsworth v. Perry, in which the Court ...
Critiques of litigation seeking to establish the right of same-sex couples to marry argue that it ha...
Perry v. Schwarzenegger, in which a federal district court held California\u27s ban on same-sex marr...
The Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review convened its 2011 Symposium, LGBT Identity and the Law, at a mo...
This paper attempts to trace the links between the Lawrence v. Texas decision and campaigns for gay ...
This chapter considers how the LGBT movement might pursue legal equality — alongside lived equality ...
Case, Hollingsworth v. Perry?\u27 Does the state\u27s reinstatement of the exclusion of lesbian and ...
Perry v. Brown, the federal lawsuit challenging Proposition 8-the California state constitutional am...
This Article discusses the progression of Perry from the filing of the case to its current status be...
In Perry v. Brown, the Ninth Circuit ruled that California’s Proposition 8 violates the Equal Protec...
The summer of 2013 saw a troubling social justice whiplash. On June 26th, in two separate decisions ...
In Perry v. Schwarzenegger, Chief Judge Vaughn Walker held that Proposition 8 — an amendment to the ...
On May 15, 2008, the California Supreme Court issued its historic decision regarding marriage rights...
This thesis looks at the state of marriage equality activism in the wake of the Supreme Court’s June...
Why, in the face of ongoing criticism, do advocates of same-sex marriage continue to pursue litigati...
This commentary previews an upcoming Supreme Court case, Hollingsworth v. Perry, in which the Court ...
Critiques of litigation seeking to establish the right of same-sex couples to marry argue that it ha...
Perry v. Schwarzenegger, in which a federal district court held California\u27s ban on same-sex marr...
The Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review convened its 2011 Symposium, LGBT Identity and the Law, at a mo...
This paper attempts to trace the links between the Lawrence v. Texas decision and campaigns for gay ...
This chapter considers how the LGBT movement might pursue legal equality — alongside lived equality ...
Case, Hollingsworth v. Perry?\u27 Does the state\u27s reinstatement of the exclusion of lesbian and ...