The Supreme Court recently embarked on a path toward removing the only teeth the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) has--its procedural mandates. In Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. and, more recently, in the controversial case Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms, the Court declined to issue an injunction against federal agency action despite the agency\u27s failure to complete an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) regarding the action, as required by NEPA
This Note considers the question of whether NEPA requires an EIS in cases of official refusal to exe...
Flooding and sea level rise in the United States is projected to become more frequent and severe due...
Since its enactment in 1970, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 has produced count...
In Northcoast Environmental Center v. Glickman, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Cir...
Critics widely disparage the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for being a mere “paper tiger”...
In 1969 Congress enacted the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA or Act) in an effort to deal wi...
Many of the Supreme Court’s important standing cases have involved environmental disputes. Most rece...
Conventional alfalfa farmers brought suit seeking an injunction against the Animal and Plant Health ...
This Article addresses the possibility, under the prevailing understanding of NEPA, that an agency m...
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1970 changed the landscape of natural resource manag...
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) ushered in the modern era of environmental law. Thanks ...
Judicial deference under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) can be problematic. It is a we...
The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation operates hundreds of dams in seventeen western states, and storage an...
The National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) requires that federal agencies prepare an environment...
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that the National Environmental Policy Act does not requir...
This Note considers the question of whether NEPA requires an EIS in cases of official refusal to exe...
Flooding and sea level rise in the United States is projected to become more frequent and severe due...
Since its enactment in 1970, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 has produced count...
In Northcoast Environmental Center v. Glickman, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Cir...
Critics widely disparage the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for being a mere “paper tiger”...
In 1969 Congress enacted the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA or Act) in an effort to deal wi...
Many of the Supreme Court’s important standing cases have involved environmental disputes. Most rece...
Conventional alfalfa farmers brought suit seeking an injunction against the Animal and Plant Health ...
This Article addresses the possibility, under the prevailing understanding of NEPA, that an agency m...
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1970 changed the landscape of natural resource manag...
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) ushered in the modern era of environmental law. Thanks ...
Judicial deference under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) can be problematic. It is a we...
The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation operates hundreds of dams in seventeen western states, and storage an...
The National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) requires that federal agencies prepare an environment...
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that the National Environmental Policy Act does not requir...
This Note considers the question of whether NEPA requires an EIS in cases of official refusal to exe...
Flooding and sea level rise in the United States is projected to become more frequent and severe due...
Since its enactment in 1970, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 has produced count...