The goal of this study was to find out the differences of chess-specific verbal knowledge among expert chess players of different skill levels through think-aloud protocol. Nine (9) expert chess players with an ELO rating ranging from 1800 to 2600 were asked to verbally report their solution, evaluation, and judgment towards chess board puzzles intended to measure one\u27s tactical ability, positional judgment, and endgame knowledge respectively. The results of the study showed that there are differences in the verbalized organization of thought processes among expert chess players in Tactical Ability, Positional Judgment and Endgame Knowledge
Despite being faced with literally millions of possibilities, the best chess players manage to find ...
While chess is often seen as a domain requiring a high level of intelligence, the available empirica...
Expert chess players, specialized in different openings, recalled positions and solved problems with...
Results from psychology show a connection between a speaker’s expertise in a task and the lan-guage ...
In this article, we briefl y survey studies of the nature of expertise, and we presentthe results of...
This thesis examines the cognitive and neural bases of expertise. In so doing, several psychological...
In two experiments the structure of knowledge representation in chess experts and average players wa...
This chapter provides an overview of research into chess expertise. After an historical background a...
Previous studies have generally found no relation between IQ and chess skill in chess experts. This ...
abstract: Abstract Chess has been a common research topic for expert-novice studies and thus for lea...
This chapter concerns symbolic problem-solving skills and discusses differences in memory use by exp...
Why are some people more skilled in complex domains than other people? Here, we conducted a meta-ana...
International audienceMore than thirty years ago, de Groot (1946,1965) then Chase and Simon (1973) s...
This study introduces the Amsterdam Chess Test (ACT). The ACT measures chess playing proficiency thr...
Theories of expertise based on the acquisition of chunk and templates suggest a differential geometr...
Despite being faced with literally millions of possibilities, the best chess players manage to find ...
While chess is often seen as a domain requiring a high level of intelligence, the available empirica...
Expert chess players, specialized in different openings, recalled positions and solved problems with...
Results from psychology show a connection between a speaker’s expertise in a task and the lan-guage ...
In this article, we briefl y survey studies of the nature of expertise, and we presentthe results of...
This thesis examines the cognitive and neural bases of expertise. In so doing, several psychological...
In two experiments the structure of knowledge representation in chess experts and average players wa...
This chapter provides an overview of research into chess expertise. After an historical background a...
Previous studies have generally found no relation between IQ and chess skill in chess experts. This ...
abstract: Abstract Chess has been a common research topic for expert-novice studies and thus for lea...
This chapter concerns symbolic problem-solving skills and discusses differences in memory use by exp...
Why are some people more skilled in complex domains than other people? Here, we conducted a meta-ana...
International audienceMore than thirty years ago, de Groot (1946,1965) then Chase and Simon (1973) s...
This study introduces the Amsterdam Chess Test (ACT). The ACT measures chess playing proficiency thr...
Theories of expertise based on the acquisition of chunk and templates suggest a differential geometr...
Despite being faced with literally millions of possibilities, the best chess players manage to find ...
While chess is often seen as a domain requiring a high level of intelligence, the available empirica...
Expert chess players, specialized in different openings, recalled positions and solved problems with...