QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does the Federal Tort Claims Act\u27s (“FTCA”) allow children of active duty mothers to bring birth injury claims against the federal government as the Fourth, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits have held, or should the Feres doctrine be expanded to bar a child\u27s birth injury claim when government negligence injures the child of an active duty mother, as the Tenth Circuit has held? 2. Does treating birth injury claims of the children of active duty military mothers differently than the children of active duty military fathers constitute unconstitutional gender discrimination
The Supreme Court’s 1950 Feres v. United States decision held that when it enacted the Federal Tort ...
Amici, representing women from all walks of life, are compelled by experience and conviction to advo...
Amici curiae, legal experts in international and constitutional law, believe that a majority of the ...
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does the Federal Tort Claims Act\u27s (“FTCA”) allow children of active duty ...
In order to right a longstanding wrong perpetrated against military mothers and their children, the ...
Through the application of the judicially created Feres doctrine, female service members who suffer ...
QUESTION PRESENTED Is the anti-relatiation provision of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S....
In Feres v. United States, the Supreme Court barred service members from suing the Government under ...
Question presented: Whether Texas statutes are unconstitutional as violating due process and equal p...
Sixty-seven years ago, Feres v. United States foreclosed service members from pursuing claims under ...
Attorneys in Washington have the resources and established standards to effectively represent childr...
On March 25, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc...
At issue is whether free exercise plaintiffs can only succeed by proving a particular type of discri...
This Note reevaluates the Feres doctrine in light of legal developments of the past three decades. I...
This Brief of Amici Curiae Scholars of the Constitutional Rights and Interests of Children in Suppor...
The Supreme Court’s 1950 Feres v. United States decision held that when it enacted the Federal Tort ...
Amici, representing women from all walks of life, are compelled by experience and conviction to advo...
Amici curiae, legal experts in international and constitutional law, believe that a majority of the ...
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does the Federal Tort Claims Act\u27s (“FTCA”) allow children of active duty ...
In order to right a longstanding wrong perpetrated against military mothers and their children, the ...
Through the application of the judicially created Feres doctrine, female service members who suffer ...
QUESTION PRESENTED Is the anti-relatiation provision of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S....
In Feres v. United States, the Supreme Court barred service members from suing the Government under ...
Question presented: Whether Texas statutes are unconstitutional as violating due process and equal p...
Sixty-seven years ago, Feres v. United States foreclosed service members from pursuing claims under ...
Attorneys in Washington have the resources and established standards to effectively represent childr...
On March 25, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc...
At issue is whether free exercise plaintiffs can only succeed by proving a particular type of discri...
This Note reevaluates the Feres doctrine in light of legal developments of the past three decades. I...
This Brief of Amici Curiae Scholars of the Constitutional Rights and Interests of Children in Suppor...
The Supreme Court’s 1950 Feres v. United States decision held that when it enacted the Federal Tort ...
Amici, representing women from all walks of life, are compelled by experience and conviction to advo...
Amici curiae, legal experts in international and constitutional law, believe that a majority of the ...