Claim Construction is the first hurdle in patent litigation to invalidate a patent. Traditionally, federal courts have interpreted claims in their plain and obvious meaning to a person skilled in the art. But a new avenue through post-grant proceedings at the patent office, such as inter-partes review, has created a worrying trend of increased patent invalidation. This comment will explore the consequences of the higher rate of invalidation, proposals suggested to solve the problem, and the actions of those who exploit it
We analyze how new information about the validity of a patent impacts the settlement of patent infri...
In the post-Markman era, the Federal Circuit has focused attention on the public notice function of ...
Can a baseball pitcher patent a method of throwing a curveball? On May 8, 2008, Judge Bryson posed t...
In 2007, a district court found a patent for a medical device valid. While the district court litiga...
The USPTO has applied the broadest reasonable interpretation (BRI) claim construction standard durin...
The ambiguity of claim language is generally considered to be the most important problem in patent l...
The America Invents Act (AIA) was widely hailed as a remedy to the excessive number of patents that ...
Inventions are tangible. Yet patents comprise words, and words are imprecise. Thus, disputes over pa...
Increasingly, accused infringers challenge a patent’s validity in two different forums: in litigatio...
The uncertainty as to whether claim interpretation decisions will survive appeal is an ever growing ...
This article explores the proper scope of judicial power in patent law by focusing on the Federal Ci...
The America Invents Act (AIA) represents the most significant change to U.S. patent law since the 19...
(Excerpt) This Article constructs a linguistics-based framework to consider claim construction and d...
Two decades ago, the Supreme Court sought to promote more effective, transparent patent litigation i...
This Article examines the Federal Circuit\u27s review of claim constructions by lower tribunals to d...
We analyze how new information about the validity of a patent impacts the settlement of patent infri...
In the post-Markman era, the Federal Circuit has focused attention on the public notice function of ...
Can a baseball pitcher patent a method of throwing a curveball? On May 8, 2008, Judge Bryson posed t...
In 2007, a district court found a patent for a medical device valid. While the district court litiga...
The USPTO has applied the broadest reasonable interpretation (BRI) claim construction standard durin...
The ambiguity of claim language is generally considered to be the most important problem in patent l...
The America Invents Act (AIA) was widely hailed as a remedy to the excessive number of patents that ...
Inventions are tangible. Yet patents comprise words, and words are imprecise. Thus, disputes over pa...
Increasingly, accused infringers challenge a patent’s validity in two different forums: in litigatio...
The uncertainty as to whether claim interpretation decisions will survive appeal is an ever growing ...
This article explores the proper scope of judicial power in patent law by focusing on the Federal Ci...
The America Invents Act (AIA) represents the most significant change to U.S. patent law since the 19...
(Excerpt) This Article constructs a linguistics-based framework to consider claim construction and d...
Two decades ago, the Supreme Court sought to promote more effective, transparent patent litigation i...
This Article examines the Federal Circuit\u27s review of claim constructions by lower tribunals to d...
We analyze how new information about the validity of a patent impacts the settlement of patent infri...
In the post-Markman era, the Federal Circuit has focused attention on the public notice function of ...
Can a baseball pitcher patent a method of throwing a curveball? On May 8, 2008, Judge Bryson posed t...