In addition to violating various provisions of federal and state constitutions, anti-gay ballot initiatives may violate international human rights norms. I see three reasons to invoke international human rights to challenge these initiatives. First, international human rights norms place the struggle for gay and lesbian rights in its proper context as a struggle for human rights. Second, some of the international human rights instruments provide both a source of legal obligation and an additional forum to challenge anti-gay ballot initiatives. Third and finally, if lesbian and gay activists in the United States establish that documents such as the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man can protect the human rights of gay and l...
In Part I, this Article presents the first published, worldwide survey of international practice in ...
This paper deals with the role of American courts, specifically their decisions, regarding the right...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Lawrence v. Texas (2003) marked the first time that tribunal took...
In addition to violating various provisions of federal and state constitutions, anti-gay ballot init...
Section II provides a brief background on the sources of international law used to advocate for and ...
The purpose of this chapter is to explore the development of the framing of the rights of lesbian, g...
The purpose of this chapter is to explore the development of the framing of the rights of lesbian, g...
Various countries around the world have been according greater protection to the rights of lesbian, ...
There is no international treaty that directly acknowledges the rights of LGBTIQ+ persons or the rig...
This article addresses the issue of how the development of International Human Rights Law and other ...
Two basic human rights principles are the prohibition against discrimination and the guarantee of eq...
This article assesses the development, status and recognition of a prohibition on sexual orientation...
Recently, the U.N. Human Rights Committee unanimously ruled that Tasmania had violated the Internati...
This article argues that international human rights law does not adequately respect people\u27s ...
In the current social and political turmoil, few issues are more divisive and cause more controve...
In Part I, this Article presents the first published, worldwide survey of international practice in ...
This paper deals with the role of American courts, specifically their decisions, regarding the right...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Lawrence v. Texas (2003) marked the first time that tribunal took...
In addition to violating various provisions of federal and state constitutions, anti-gay ballot init...
Section II provides a brief background on the sources of international law used to advocate for and ...
The purpose of this chapter is to explore the development of the framing of the rights of lesbian, g...
The purpose of this chapter is to explore the development of the framing of the rights of lesbian, g...
Various countries around the world have been according greater protection to the rights of lesbian, ...
There is no international treaty that directly acknowledges the rights of LGBTIQ+ persons or the rig...
This article addresses the issue of how the development of International Human Rights Law and other ...
Two basic human rights principles are the prohibition against discrimination and the guarantee of eq...
This article assesses the development, status and recognition of a prohibition on sexual orientation...
Recently, the U.N. Human Rights Committee unanimously ruled that Tasmania had violated the Internati...
This article argues that international human rights law does not adequately respect people\u27s ...
In the current social and political turmoil, few issues are more divisive and cause more controve...
In Part I, this Article presents the first published, worldwide survey of international practice in ...
This paper deals with the role of American courts, specifically their decisions, regarding the right...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Lawrence v. Texas (2003) marked the first time that tribunal took...