This article explores the current debate about service and Joint operating concepts, starting with the Army’s multi-domain operations concept. It argues for adaptations to an old operational design technique—defeat mechanisms; updates to Joint and service planning doctrine; and discipline regarding emerging concepts. Rather than debate over attrition versus maneuver, combinations of a suite of defeat mechanisms should be applied to gain victory in the future
The main goal of this paper is to analyze the new theoretical concepts that provide a vision regardi...
This article examines how Army Special Operations might prepare to expand in the event of a major wa...
This article examines the US Army’s experiences and lessons learned during military interventions in...
This article describes the newest doctrine of the U.S. Armed Forces, i.e. the Multi- Domain Battle (...
The 1982 Army Field Manual (FM) 100-5, Operations, introduced the idea of an operational level of wa...
Since achieving victory in World War II, the United States military has a less than enviable combat ...
Over the last several years there have been a number of calls for the development of a new theoretic...
The concept of hybrid war has evolved from operational-level use of military means and methods in wa...
To help the Army redefine operations in failed states, I propose a new politico-military model. This...
Proceedings of the 1996 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium: Command and Control i...
Weaponry and concepts (that is to say, combat theory, or more specifically, doctrine regarding the p...
To counter the threat posed by adversary information activities, the U.S. Army has developed a new w...
This article challenges the concept and, by default, the continuum shown in Figure 1 and the range o...
The lethality, precision, and global reach of the American way of war has changed the modern charact...
This article sheds light on operative doctrines of today’s armed forces and on their backgrounds. It...
The main goal of this paper is to analyze the new theoretical concepts that provide a vision regardi...
This article examines how Army Special Operations might prepare to expand in the event of a major wa...
This article examines the US Army’s experiences and lessons learned during military interventions in...
This article describes the newest doctrine of the U.S. Armed Forces, i.e. the Multi- Domain Battle (...
The 1982 Army Field Manual (FM) 100-5, Operations, introduced the idea of an operational level of wa...
Since achieving victory in World War II, the United States military has a less than enviable combat ...
Over the last several years there have been a number of calls for the development of a new theoretic...
The concept of hybrid war has evolved from operational-level use of military means and methods in wa...
To help the Army redefine operations in failed states, I propose a new politico-military model. This...
Proceedings of the 1996 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium: Command and Control i...
Weaponry and concepts (that is to say, combat theory, or more specifically, doctrine regarding the p...
To counter the threat posed by adversary information activities, the U.S. Army has developed a new w...
This article challenges the concept and, by default, the continuum shown in Figure 1 and the range o...
The lethality, precision, and global reach of the American way of war has changed the modern charact...
This article sheds light on operative doctrines of today’s armed forces and on their backgrounds. It...
The main goal of this paper is to analyze the new theoretical concepts that provide a vision regardi...
This article examines how Army Special Operations might prepare to expand in the event of a major wa...
This article examines the US Army’s experiences and lessons learned during military interventions in...
DOI
Add to ORKG