Mikhalevich & Powell (2020) have built on the discussion about which species deserve inclusion in animal ethics and welfare considerations. Here, we raise questions concerning the assessment criteria. We ask how to assess different species for their ability to fulfill the criteria, which criteria are most important, how we quantify them (absolute or on a continuum), and how non-animals such as fungi and plants fit into this paradigm
Speciesism should play no role in determining welfare outcomes. Cognition may vary within species as...
The actions of sentient vertebrates command our attention and inform our morality. Mikhalevich & Pow...
Neither sentience nor moral standing is confined to animals with large or human-like brains. Inverte...
Welfare protections for vertebrates are grounded in the belief that vertebrates are sentient and cap...
Invertebrates are far more numerous than vertebrates. Most of them are essential to the survival of ...
Mikhalevich & Powell (2020) argue that it is wrong, both scientifically and morally, to dismiss the ...
Mikhalevich & Powell (M&P) set up the basic criteria for according moral status equitably, including...
Mikhalevich & Powell are to be commended for challenging the “invertebrate dogma” that invertebrates...
Mikhalevich and Powell (2020) argue that it is both scientifically and morally wrong to dismiss the ...
In their target article, Mikhalevich & Powell (M&P) argue that we should extend moral protection to ...
Mikhalevich & Powell provide convincing empirical evidence that at least some invertebrates are sent...
—Commentary on Mikhalevich and Powell on invertebrate minds.— Whether or not arthropods are sentient...
Invertebrate animals are frequently lumped into a single category and denied welfare protections des...
Invertebrate animals are frequently lumped into a single category and denied welfare protections des...
Mikhalevich & Powell (2020) argue that we should attribute moral standing not only to vertebrates bu...
Speciesism should play no role in determining welfare outcomes. Cognition may vary within species as...
The actions of sentient vertebrates command our attention and inform our morality. Mikhalevich & Pow...
Neither sentience nor moral standing is confined to animals with large or human-like brains. Inverte...
Welfare protections for vertebrates are grounded in the belief that vertebrates are sentient and cap...
Invertebrates are far more numerous than vertebrates. Most of them are essential to the survival of ...
Mikhalevich & Powell (2020) argue that it is wrong, both scientifically and morally, to dismiss the ...
Mikhalevich & Powell (M&P) set up the basic criteria for according moral status equitably, including...
Mikhalevich & Powell are to be commended for challenging the “invertebrate dogma” that invertebrates...
Mikhalevich and Powell (2020) argue that it is both scientifically and morally wrong to dismiss the ...
In their target article, Mikhalevich & Powell (M&P) argue that we should extend moral protection to ...
Mikhalevich & Powell provide convincing empirical evidence that at least some invertebrates are sent...
—Commentary on Mikhalevich and Powell on invertebrate minds.— Whether or not arthropods are sentient...
Invertebrate animals are frequently lumped into a single category and denied welfare protections des...
Invertebrate animals are frequently lumped into a single category and denied welfare protections des...
Mikhalevich & Powell (2020) argue that we should attribute moral standing not only to vertebrates bu...
Speciesism should play no role in determining welfare outcomes. Cognition may vary within species as...
The actions of sentient vertebrates command our attention and inform our morality. Mikhalevich & Pow...
Neither sentience nor moral standing is confined to animals with large or human-like brains. Inverte...