Add to ORKGCommentators Washington (2019) and Tiffin (2019) point out that the individual vs. collective dichotomy is much more complex than what is considered in the target article. This commentary will focus on why individuals are more important than collectives. Species differences in cognition and emotional processes and individuals’ feelings and experiences need to be taken into account
Chapman & Huffman suggest that humans’ views of their own superiority are a source of their callousn...
We share Chapman & Huffman’s views on the importance of promoting animal welfare and conservation. W...
Chapman & Huffman suggest that to correct our thinking about the supposed superiority of humans over...
Commentators Washington (2019) and Tiffin (2019) point out that the individual vs. collective dichot...
Our commentators come from many fields and disciplines and express highly divergent views, illustrat...
Treves et al.’s target article can play an important role in reconciling the needs of future generat...
Treves et al. are right about the need for morally just preservation of nonhumans. Their suggestions...
Chapman & Huffman argue that the cognitive differences between humans and nonhuman animals do not ma...
Chapman & Huffman (2018) argue that we should not consider humans as unique or superior to other ani...
Treves et al.’s target article emphasizes the importance of including nonhuman animals in the scope ...
Chapman & Huffman’s moral analysis fails to prove that the exploitation of animals or the environmen...
It seems impossible for a human being not to have some point of view concerning nonhuman animal (her...
This commentary discusses various shortcomings in Chapman & Huffman’s (2018) denial of differences b...
Some recent psychological studies suggest that the belief that humans matter more than other animals...
I commend Mikhalevich & Powell for extending the discussion of cognition and its relation to moral s...
Chapman & Huffman suggest that humans’ views of their own superiority are a source of their callousn...
We share Chapman & Huffman’s views on the importance of promoting animal welfare and conservation. W...
Chapman & Huffman suggest that to correct our thinking about the supposed superiority of humans over...
Commentators Washington (2019) and Tiffin (2019) point out that the individual vs. collective dichot...
Our commentators come from many fields and disciplines and express highly divergent views, illustrat...
Treves et al.’s target article can play an important role in reconciling the needs of future generat...
Treves et al. are right about the need for morally just preservation of nonhumans. Their suggestions...
Chapman & Huffman argue that the cognitive differences between humans and nonhuman animals do not ma...
Chapman & Huffman (2018) argue that we should not consider humans as unique or superior to other ani...
Treves et al.’s target article emphasizes the importance of including nonhuman animals in the scope ...
Chapman & Huffman’s moral analysis fails to prove that the exploitation of animals or the environmen...
It seems impossible for a human being not to have some point of view concerning nonhuman animal (her...
This commentary discusses various shortcomings in Chapman & Huffman’s (2018) denial of differences b...
Some recent psychological studies suggest that the belief that humans matter more than other animals...
I commend Mikhalevich & Powell for extending the discussion of cognition and its relation to moral s...
Chapman & Huffman suggest that humans’ views of their own superiority are a source of their callousn...
We share Chapman & Huffman’s views on the importance of promoting animal welfare and conservation. W...
Chapman & Huffman suggest that to correct our thinking about the supposed superiority of humans over...