Add to ORKGWhy are humans so ignorant with regard to the fundamental gap between ethical claims and the status quo of the human-animal relationship? To answer this, we should include more psychological and sociological perspectives in our discussions
This article provides an empirically based, interdisciplinary approach to the following two question...
Sentience involves having some degree of awareness but awareness of self is not as complex as some p...
Humans have long considered themselves unique in the animal kingdom. However, assumptions about huma...
Chapman & Huffman’s moral analysis fails to prove that the exploitation of animals or the environmen...
Why are humans so ignorant with regard to the fundamental gap between ethical claims and the status ...
In their target article, Rowan et al (2022) make a welcome attempt to chart the development of Weste...
This commentary discusses various shortcomings in Chapman & Huffman’s (2018) denial of differences b...
Is morality uniquely human or does morality exist in at least some non-human animals? Are animals fu...
Debates in applied ethics about the proper treatment of animals often refer to empirical data about ...
Chapman & Huffman argue that the cognitive differences between humans and nonhuman animals do not ma...
Broom (2014) argues that theories of animal ethics need to be better informed by the findings of ani...
Marino & Merskin present evidence on key aspects of cognition, such as theory of mind, learning, emo...
I sketch briefly some of the more influential theories concerned with the moral status of nonhuman a...
A focus on animal welfare in the use of nonhuman animals in the service of human economic and scient...
The answer to Chapman & Huffman’s question — “Why do we want to think humans are different?” — lies ...
This article provides an empirically based, interdisciplinary approach to the following two question...
Sentience involves having some degree of awareness but awareness of self is not as complex as some p...
Humans have long considered themselves unique in the animal kingdom. However, assumptions about huma...
Chapman & Huffman’s moral analysis fails to prove that the exploitation of animals or the environmen...
Why are humans so ignorant with regard to the fundamental gap between ethical claims and the status ...
In their target article, Rowan et al (2022) make a welcome attempt to chart the development of Weste...
This commentary discusses various shortcomings in Chapman & Huffman’s (2018) denial of differences b...
Is morality uniquely human or does morality exist in at least some non-human animals? Are animals fu...
Debates in applied ethics about the proper treatment of animals often refer to empirical data about ...
Chapman & Huffman argue that the cognitive differences between humans and nonhuman animals do not ma...
Broom (2014) argues that theories of animal ethics need to be better informed by the findings of ani...
Marino & Merskin present evidence on key aspects of cognition, such as theory of mind, learning, emo...
I sketch briefly some of the more influential theories concerned with the moral status of nonhuman a...
A focus on animal welfare in the use of nonhuman animals in the service of human economic and scient...
The answer to Chapman & Huffman’s question — “Why do we want to think humans are different?” — lies ...
This article provides an empirically based, interdisciplinary approach to the following two question...
Sentience involves having some degree of awareness but awareness of self is not as complex as some p...
Humans have long considered themselves unique in the animal kingdom. However, assumptions about huma...