The impact of sustainability on fire safety

There is a growing demand for building green buildings that are perceived to have benefits environmentally through promoting recycling, energy efficiency and efficient use of resources. The green movement has also led to innovative technologies that are focused on reducing cost. However, the fire safety industry has concerns with the use of certain technologies that create passages for smoke and fire to spread such as passive ventilation or materials that can burn severely and release large amount of toxins. The benefit of this research is to determine which features are high risk and are commonly used. The aim of this research is to investigate whether sustainable or green features have an influence on fire safety in commercial buildings and determine which feature or features would have the most significant implications for building safety in regards to tenability. A detailed investigation was done on passive ventilation such as double skin facade and the thesis also briefly discusses other green features and their implications. There were two methods used to collect data. The first was a qualitative study done through sending out surveys to fire engineers to rate and rank the most significant features that have negative implications for fire safety in reference to the New Zealand Building Code Fire Safety Section criteria and objectives. Then, a one hour interview was carried out to determine the reason behind the engineers’ choice and their perceptions. The results from the surveys and the interviews were that double skin facade and atrium were ranked the most significant. The surveys established double skin facade has the highest ranking in terms of the worst feature, and the fire engineers reinforced that double skin facade needs to be studied as there is not enough research that have gone into this feature. While atrium issues are known and mitigation measures are well developed. A subsequent analysis for only double skin facade is conducted using Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) because little literature is found in regards to fire safety and double skin facade. FDS was used to simulate 14 small models and 2 large models for the best and worst scenarios of DSF. Each of the 14 models, one to three parameters are changed as part of the sensitivity study to determine which parameter have the most and least effect on fire safety in term of Carbon Monoxide (CO) and visibility. The issues the engineers raised and the mitigation measures were modelled, because the engineers had stated their opinions not facts. The output results from FDS illustrated that it is essential that the system shuts off in a fire event to prevent smoke spread to upper floors, which is the same mitigation measure that were emphasised at the interviews.