This paper explores the dynamic relationship between corporations and Chicago law and economics from 1946 through the mid-1950s. It argues that corporations and Chicago law and economics had a mutually beneficial relationship, especially after the birth of Chicago neoliberalism in 1950. Corporations made possible the rise of Chicago law and economics through funding and advice. Chicago law and economics in return provided scholarly research that corporations sought to challenge the status quo antitrust positions of government. The relationship between Chicago law and economics and corporations in this period gave rise to critical institutions that would inspire the institutions of Chicago law in economics during its ascendency from the 1960...
Beginning in the 1950s, a group of scholars primarily associated with the University of Chicago bega...
Although law and economics has influenced nearly every area of American law, few have been as deeply...
This symposium began with a call for papers “reassessing the validity of the Chicago School’s assump...
In this article, the authors interrogate legal and economic history to analyze the process by which ...
The Law and Economics movement that emerged in the University of Chicago through the 1940s and 1950s...
In this article,we use a history of economic thought perspective to analyze the process by which the...
Of all of Chicago\u27s law and economics conquests, antitrust was the most complete and resounding v...
International audienceWe interrogate the legal and economic history to analyse the process by which...
The postwar Chicago School is commonly associated with a pro-corporate standpoint because of its po...
The Chicago School of antitrust has benefited from a great deal of law office history, written by ad...
The institutionalist approach to law and economics declined markedly after the Second World War and ...
This volume provides a practical answer to, among other questions, Whither public law after the `Chi...
An economically oriented and technocratic view of antitrust has dominated the discipline’s practice ...
Beginning in the 1950s, a group of scholars primarily associated with the University of Chicago bega...
Although law and economics has influenced nearly every area of American law, few have been as deeply...
This symposium began with a call for papers “reassessing the validity of the Chicago School’s assump...
In this article, the authors interrogate legal and economic history to analyze the process by which ...
The Law and Economics movement that emerged in the University of Chicago through the 1940s and 1950s...
In this article,we use a history of economic thought perspective to analyze the process by which the...
Of all of Chicago\u27s law and economics conquests, antitrust was the most complete and resounding v...
International audienceWe interrogate the legal and economic history to analyse the process by which...
The postwar Chicago School is commonly associated with a pro-corporate standpoint because of its po...
The Chicago School of antitrust has benefited from a great deal of law office history, written by ad...
The institutionalist approach to law and economics declined markedly after the Second World War and ...
This volume provides a practical answer to, among other questions, Whither public law after the `Chi...
An economically oriented and technocratic view of antitrust has dominated the discipline’s practice ...
Beginning in the 1950s, a group of scholars primarily associated with the University of Chicago bega...
Although law and economics has influenced nearly every area of American law, few have been as deeply...
This symposium began with a call for papers “reassessing the validity of the Chicago School’s assump...