Add to ORKGThe authors argue that learning from existing evidence is a key skill both for researchers and policy makers. However, how do you go about accomplishing this? What are the key approaches, and how do you make the right choices? Additionally, what are the common pitfalls? This chapter gives the reader a guide to best practice in systematic reviews
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews provide a transparent and robust summary of existing research. Howeve...
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews provide a transparent and robust summary of existing research. Howeve...
Background The preparation of rigorous systematic reviews to address public health policy questions...
Systematic reviews provide a vital tool for policy makers and practitioners to find what works, how ...
This study employed insider research and reflective practice to investigate exchanges across the res...
The last few decades have seen a growing emphasis on evidence-based decision making in health care. ...
Background: The last 35 years have seen a proliferation of systematic reviews seeking to synthesise ...
There is common agreement that public policy should be formulated based onknowledge of how it works ...
This article proposes a new approach to assessing evidence during a systematic evidence review aimin...
This article proposes a new approach to assessing evidence during a systematic evidence review aimin...
There is common agreement that public policy should be formulated based onknowledge of how it works ...
There is common agreement that public policy should be formulated based onknowledge of how it works ...
Systematic reviews are widely accepted as a ‘gold standard’ in evidence synthesis and the meta-analy...
The concept of systematic reviewing of research literatures became influential in the second half of...
BACKGROUND: Conducting a systematic review in social policy is a resource-intensive process in terms...
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews provide a transparent and robust summary of existing research. Howeve...
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews provide a transparent and robust summary of existing research. Howeve...
Background The preparation of rigorous systematic reviews to address public health policy questions...
Systematic reviews provide a vital tool for policy makers and practitioners to find what works, how ...
This study employed insider research and reflective practice to investigate exchanges across the res...
The last few decades have seen a growing emphasis on evidence-based decision making in health care. ...
Background: The last 35 years have seen a proliferation of systematic reviews seeking to synthesise ...
There is common agreement that public policy should be formulated based onknowledge of how it works ...
This article proposes a new approach to assessing evidence during a systematic evidence review aimin...
This article proposes a new approach to assessing evidence during a systematic evidence review aimin...
There is common agreement that public policy should be formulated based onknowledge of how it works ...
There is common agreement that public policy should be formulated based onknowledge of how it works ...
Systematic reviews are widely accepted as a ‘gold standard’ in evidence synthesis and the meta-analy...
The concept of systematic reviewing of research literatures became influential in the second half of...
BACKGROUND: Conducting a systematic review in social policy is a resource-intensive process in terms...
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews provide a transparent and robust summary of existing research. Howeve...
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews provide a transparent and robust summary of existing research. Howeve...
Background The preparation of rigorous systematic reviews to address public health policy questions...