Development of the utero-placental circulation in cesarean scar pregnancies: A case-control study

BACKGROUND: Cesarean scar pregnancies (CSP) are at high risk of pregnancy complications including placenta previa with antepartum hemorrhage, placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) and uterine rupture. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the development of the utero-placental circulation in the first half of pregnancy in ongoing CSP and compare it to pregnancies implanted in the lower uterine segment above a prior cesarean section scar with no evidence of PAS at delivery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study conducted in two tertiary referral centers. The study group included 27 women diagnosed with a live caesarean scar pregnancy in the first trimester of pregnancy who elected to conservative management. The control group included 27 women diagnosed with a low-lying/placenta previa at 19-22 weeks of gestation who had a first and an early second trimester ultrasound examinations. In both groups, the first ultrasound examination was carried out at 6-10 weeks to establish pregnancy location, viability and to confirm the gestational age. The utero-placental and intra-placental vasculatures were examined using color Doppler imaging (CDI) and described semi quantitatively using CDI score 1-4. The remaining myometrial thickness (RMT) was recorded in the study group whereas in the controls the ultrasound features of prior cesarean scar were noted including the presence of a niche. Both CSP and controls had also ultrasound examinations at 11-14 and 19-22 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: The mean CDI vascularity score at the 6-10 weeks ultrasound examination was significantly (P <.001) higher in the CSP group than in the controls. The high vascularity scores 3 and 4 were recorded in 20/27 (74%) cases of the CSP group. There was no vascularity score of 4 and only 3/27 (11%) controls had vascularity score of 3. In 15/27 (55.6%) CSPs the RMT was < 2 mm. At the 11-14 weeks ultrasound examination, there was no significant difference between the groups for the number of cases with increased subplacental vascularity but 12 CSPs (44%) presented with one or more placental lacunae whereas there was no case with lacunae in the controls. In the 18 CSP that progressed into the third trimester, ten were diagnosed with placenta previa creta at birth, including 4 creta and 6 increta. At the 19-22 weeks ultrasound examination, eight of the ten PAS presented with subplacental hypervascularity out of which, six showed also placental lacunae. CONCLUSION: The vascular changes in the utero-placental and intervillous circulations in CSPs are due to the loss of the normal uterine structure in the scar area and the development of placental tissue in proximity of large diameter arteries of the outer uterine wall. The intensity of these vascular changes, development of PAS and risk of uterine rupture depend on the RMT of the cesarean scar defect at the start of pregnancy. A better understanding of the pathophysiology of the utero-placental vascular changes associated with CSP should help in identifying those cases that may develop major complications and thus contribute to counselling women about the risks associated with different management strategies