Topics
OhioPlace
Supreme CourtPlace
A diverse set of stakeholders filed 18 amicus briefs urging the Supreme Court to strike down Ohio's Supplemental Process -- an illegal voter purge practice that removes eligible voters from the rolls for failure to vote, in violation of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA)
This briefing paper summarizes election administration litigation that is active or has been settled...
Symposium on Re-Examining the Voting Rights Act: Where Is Our Nation after Shelby County v. Holde
This June, a 6-3 Supreme Court decision further eroded the Voting Rights Act (VRA) by upholding an A...
In the 2018 case of Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute, a divided United States Supreme Court up...
On Election Day 2016, some Ohio residents turned out to vote only to be told their names had been re...
In Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute, the Supreme Court will decide whether the Ohio’s Suppleme...
The election of President Donald Trump set in motion the aggressive rollback of Obama-era environmen...
Since the United States Supreme Court struck down section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act ( VRA ) and ...
In Brnovich, the Court will determine whether Arizona’s out-of-precinct (OOP) policy and its ballot-...
When voters venture to local polling place, must they temporarily forfeit their constitutionally-gua...
This commentary previews an upcoming Supreme Court case, Shelby County v. Holder, in which the Court...
Voting Rights Act still needed; Refugee and Asylum Fellows; Consensus guides WTO\u27s Applellate Bod...
Since its inception, the Roberts Court has acquiesced in—and at times even abetted—the attempts of m...
Earlier this year, with the 2022 midterm elections looming, New York’s Democratic members of Congres...
The presidential election on November 2, 2004, was perhaps one of the most watched and contentious e...
This briefing paper summarizes election administration litigation that is active or has been settled...
Symposium on Re-Examining the Voting Rights Act: Where Is Our Nation after Shelby County v. Holde
This June, a 6-3 Supreme Court decision further eroded the Voting Rights Act (VRA) by upholding an A...
In the 2018 case of Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute, a divided United States Supreme Court up...
On Election Day 2016, some Ohio residents turned out to vote only to be told their names had been re...
In Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute, the Supreme Court will decide whether the Ohio’s Suppleme...
The election of President Donald Trump set in motion the aggressive rollback of Obama-era environmen...
Since the United States Supreme Court struck down section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act ( VRA ) and ...
In Brnovich, the Court will determine whether Arizona’s out-of-precinct (OOP) policy and its ballot-...
When voters venture to local polling place, must they temporarily forfeit their constitutionally-gua...
This commentary previews an upcoming Supreme Court case, Shelby County v. Holder, in which the Court...
Voting Rights Act still needed; Refugee and Asylum Fellows; Consensus guides WTO\u27s Applellate Bod...
Since its inception, the Roberts Court has acquiesced in—and at times even abetted—the attempts of m...
Earlier this year, with the 2022 midterm elections looming, New York’s Democratic members of Congres...
The presidential election on November 2, 2004, was perhaps one of the most watched and contentious e...
This briefing paper summarizes election administration litigation that is active or has been settled...
Symposium on Re-Examining the Voting Rights Act: Where Is Our Nation after Shelby County v. Holde
This June, a 6-3 Supreme Court decision further eroded the Voting Rights Act (VRA) by upholding an A...
Add to ORKG